RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Post by **Tubs** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:41 am

Has anyone ever compared the two?

Justin

Post by **Lowgear** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:31 am

What do you mean exactly? Gearing wise? Physical appearance?

Post by **LowClassCC** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:40 am

seeing the rpm 2.65trans is over 80% stealth what is there to compare? i weighed both and think the rpm was around 3 grams heaver due to the extra case material. the only other real difference is the gear ratio. 2.25 compared to 2.65. the modern rc10b4 has a 2.60 trans. thus for gearing with modern motors you can use the same gearing as they are using as a starting point and pretty much be dead on.

Post by **Tubs** » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:32 pm

Thanks everyone. I was trying to compare the ratios.

Justin

Post by **ffpm46** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:58 am

Hello,

is speaking of the RPM 2.65 Tranny case and top shaft, Can I mount a B4/T4 slipper on it? If not why?

Thank you

Post by **Lowgear** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:22 am

This will answer your question: http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=14854&start=0

RC10Talk - The Net's Largest Vintage R/C Community

RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

Create an account

Sign in

Who is online