My works 92
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
My works 92
Back when I raced when as a kid I worked m way up to a 870c dogfighter and even in my hands was a good car.
I remember when the works 91 was in all the mags and as most kids I could never afford one till now.
This arrived in the post this morning
Bought from a fellow oople'er a low use car which is in great condition just needs a bit of time spending on it.
So now to pick people's brains. I'm taking it the front shock tower will be a hop up? and I didn't realise the front box was plastic/nylon, what do I need to do other than strip and rebuild the diffs to get it back on the track?
And yes I know I'm gonna have to get the nail varnish remover out ASAP
I remember when the works 91 was in all the mags and as most kids I could never afford one till now.
This arrived in the post this morning
Bought from a fellow oople'er a low use car which is in great condition just needs a bit of time spending on it.
So now to pick people's brains. I'm taking it the front shock tower will be a hop up? and I didn't realise the front box was plastic/nylon, what do I need to do other than strip and rebuild the diffs to get it back on the track?
And yes I know I'm gonna have to get the nail varnish remover out ASAP
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:03 pm
- Location: China
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: My works 91
Yes, the front bulkhead is hop up option, but the original works91 is using fine pitch belt and pulley set, may be yours are works92
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: My works 91
It may well be a 92 I'm trying to find out if the car came with the belts or he changed them at some point as he's had it since new. Tbh I'm glad it's got the 3m belts I was going to try and change them anyway.
What other differences was there from the 91 to the 92?
What other differences was there from the 91 to the 92?
- stickboy007
- Approved Member
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:13 pm
- Location: Mahopac, NY
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: My works 91
The front and rear towers, and the rear hub carriers, are different between the 91 and the 92. Yours is pretty clearly a 92.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: My works 91
I've spoken to the guy I got it from and he's adamant it's a 91. So he was obviously mis sold it as he's had it from new and said he remembers the box having 91 on it.
He's also now found the works 91 instructions that came with it (again in Japanese) which he's going to post to me.
So from all that if it's got all the 92 bits it must be as he's told me he can't remember changing the belts or anything else on the car as that's how it came.
He's also now found the works 91 instructions that came with it (again in Japanese) which he's going to post to me.
So from all that if it's got all the 92 bits it must be as he's told me he can't remember changing the belts or anything else on the car as that's how it came.
- stickboy007
- Approved Member
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:13 pm
- Location: Mahopac, NY
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: My works 91
Well I've never seen a Works '92 box. Even the Works '93 box is a '91 box with a sticker on it that says Works '93. Maybe there was a similar Works '92 sticker that was made? I don't know. What I can say is that I have two original Works '91 manuals, but one has pictures of what are clearly Works '92 parts while the other has pics of what are clearly Works '91 parts.
http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=34852&start=15
http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=34852&start=15
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: My works 91
I recon it was a 92 in a 91 box if it's got all the 92 bits on as he said he only used it a few times and didn't do much to it but he did say that the shells not original.
I found a 92 box here
http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=24157
I found a 92 box here
http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=24157
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: My works 91
That is some parts stash Stickboy I'll take a shell and under tray off you and any other parts you no longer needstickboy007 wrote:Well I've never seen a Works '92 box. Even the Works '93 box is a '91 box with a sticker on it that says Works '93. Maybe there was a similar Works '92 sticker that was made? I don't know. What I can say is that I have two original Works '91 manuals, but one has pictures of what are clearly Works '92 parts while the other has pics of what are clearly Works '91 parts.
http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=34852&start=15
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:20 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: My works 91
I ordered the Tugh belts for mine like stick said he used. Took 2 weeks from Korea. Was around 17 shipped for both. Seam to be easier and cheaper than finding originals if this is a runner.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: My works 91
There's one just finished on eBay but I couldn't make out the part number I'm waiting for the seller to get back to me
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:55 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: My works 91
Got the manual through today and it's the one with the works 92 shock towers in. So which was harder to fine the 91 or the 92 ?
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: My works 91
Hi guys. Im currently designing parts for the works 91. Im working off patterns supplied by Stickboy007.(huge thanks!) S0, I dont have a complete car to work with. Heres what Im wondering. How do you guys feel about Yokomo using additional holes in the works 91 bulk head caps to mount the top plate? I didnt realize this untill comparing my 870c top deck to the works91 topdeck,, and it became apparent that the works91 top deck does not mount through the 2mm holes that the bulk head caps secure with. So, was the builder required to make these holes them self, or were the works 91 bulk head caps pre drilled with these holes?
What size and type hardware secures the wks91 top deck?
As restoration aficionados, would there be any interest in a works 91 top deck that mounts same as the 870c topdeck, through the 2mm bulkhead screw holes,, but looks otherwise like a proper works 91 part,,, just no extra holes in the bulk head caps, and slightly longer front and rear to accommodate the factory 2mm screws?
Thanks! You guys really motivate me. Im hoping to have a works 91 replica here soon. Got most of the hardware,, working on the flat plate parts.
What size and type hardware secures the wks91 top deck?
As restoration aficionados, would there be any interest in a works 91 top deck that mounts same as the 870c topdeck, through the 2mm bulkhead screw holes,, but looks otherwise like a proper works 91 part,,, just no extra holes in the bulk head caps, and slightly longer front and rear to accommodate the factory 2mm screws?
Thanks! You guys really motivate me. Im hoping to have a works 91 replica here soon. Got most of the hardware,, working on the flat plate parts.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 6 Replies
- 915 Views
-
Last post by NRG
-
- 20 Replies
- 2166 Views
-
Last post by flustorm99
-
- 6 Replies
- 1995 Views
-
Last post by Synergy
-
- 11 Replies
- 1797 Views
-
Last post by stickboy007
-
- 11 Replies
- 1651 Views
-
Last post by Kiwidave
-
- 19 Replies
- 2970 Views
-
Last post by fakiee
-
- 9 Replies
- 1846 Views
-
Last post by Asso_man!
-
- 8 Replies
- 912 Views
-
Last post by jwscab
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest