What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20/11)

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Updated 5/19)

Post by aeiou »

Thanks Guys.

Those wheels are nice. Besides looking good, they run true and dirt doesn’t get clogged up in them.

bngiles wrote:Which BL motor do you run in it, and what pinion spur did you end up using?
The motor is an older Novak SS5800 with the sintered rotor and end bell upgrade. As of right now, I have the gearing pretty high as I’m just testing it around the back yard and working out the bugs. I’ll fine tune the gearing when I finally get it to the track. Here’s what’s in it now – 19/85 (the RPM tranny conversion is 2.65:1).

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Updated 5/19)

Post by Asso_man! »

Hey aeiou, this past weekend I did the same upgrade to my runner with RPM wrold's rear arms and RPM rear carriers with B4 CVD's, I have the following problem: when the rear end is at full compression, the CVD's are sort of cogging inside the outdrives and the diff can't work properly. How did you sort that out (if you have had the same problem)? I didn't measure yet, but I thought it could be due to a higher OD of the CVD nut compared to the RC10 stock CVD's... I also find out that the up and down travel of the rear end is overall very limited due to this problem and also because the CVD's are a bit too long?
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Updated 5/19)

Post by aeiou »

Hi Asso_man.

I would suspect your issue has to do with the hubs you are using. I’m pretty sure the RPM Worlds hubs have the same dimensions as the stock RC10 hubs, relative to the axle spacing. During the early experimentation with the prototype, I had the same symptoms you are experiencing with the stock hubs, and that’s what lead me down the path of using the RC10T hubs. On the RC10T hubs, the inside bearing is closer to the hinge pin.

As best I recall, the stock RC10T rear hubs worked without any adjustment. In the end, however, I used the RPM RC10GT truck hubs, primarily because they allowed a much higher axle height (lower CG) than the stock RC10T hubs (and they are readily available). As I mentioned earlier in this post, I ended up drilling the RPM truck hubs out slightly (with shims on the outside), to make sure there was no binding.

I hope this helps.

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Updated 5/19)

Post by Asso_man! »

thanks for the answer mate. I have those RC10GT hubs, but I'm afraid I don't have the correct bearings, what bearing size did you use? Flanged or unflanged? I'll try tonight with RC10T stock hubs and will let you know. On a side note, I guess you also drilled the front C-hubs to accomodate the larger OD hinge pins?
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Updated 5/19)

Post by aeiou »

Asso_man! wrote:... what bearing size did you use? Flanged or unflanged?
3/16" X 1/2" unflanged - http://www.avidrc.com/shop/?action=item&id=117

FYI - I used the revolution bearings in my runner with the rubber seals removed.

Asso_man! wrote:On a side note, I guess you also drilled the front C-hubs to accomodate the larger OD hinge pins?
That would be correct... 8)

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Updated 5/19)

Post by Asso_man! »

damnit, I am supposed to take this car to an enduro race next Sunday and hoped to make use of the rear end revamping to run B4, I don't have time to order the correct bearings :twisted: anyway, I could always switch back to the stock rear end...
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by Asso_man! »

Well, I tried with the RC10T rear hubs along with unflanged bearings and it doesn't work withour any mod. I think I'll go back to the stock set-up and forget about using B4 wheels, I think that even if I drill the RC10GT/T hubs, the suspension will anyway have too little travel and this is not something you would like for a real off-road car...
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by aeiou »

Sorry to hear your build is putting up such a fight, Asso_man. I know it must be frustrating trying to ready a new concept so close to an event. Those rear hubs worked fine for me during the early mock-up and the RPM GT hubs even better now after some adjustments.

Just curious, what size shocks are you using in the rear? Do you run a lot of negative camber?

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by Asso_man! »

well I tried the B4 shocks and the stock ones both with a RC10t shock tower and a stock shock tower and almost no neg. camber, if I want to make it work properly, I end up with a ridiculous amount of shock travel and the chassis doesn't touch the ground when fully compressed... I also found that you can't use the outside hole on the rear arms, hence I need to change the shock oil and pistons too to have a good dampening.
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by aeiou »

True, there’s just not enough clearance to use those outside shock mount holes without having contact with the wheels. With the Dynotech arms, that area is flat and you have the ability to drill an extra position between the two if you like, but I know that’s not the case with the RPM arms. Fortunately, there are some reasonable workarounds for that as you mentioned.

This is a modified B4 rear hub that I also tried. Although it took a bit more fabrication to get it to work, it actually provided the best clearance and travel of all the options (as best I recall). The downside is the higher CG. I reduced the outside profile and deepened the outside bearing slot. I used ¼” axle spacers inside the hub to get the bearing spacing just right. As you can see, there’s also an obscene amount of camber dialed into it… :lol:

I know you are pressed for time with your build / event, but I thought you (and others) might find this interesting.

Image

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by Asso_man! »

thanks for the info, please feel free to share everything you've tested, definitely not an easy mod. I think I'll try again when I have more time and will stick to what I know is working :)
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16521
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 955 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by scr8p »

Asso_man! wrote:I also found that you can't use the outside hole on the rear arms, hence I need to change the shock oil and pistons too to have a good dampening.
actually, since the entire arm is moved out, because of using a stock rc10 arm mount, the inside shock mount hole on the arm is about the same as the outside would be if the chassis was modified to used the worlds arm mounts.

just something to think about.................

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by Asso_man! »

you're right Jason, except that the arm isn't longer, the "lever effect" being more or less the same :wink:
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16521
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 955 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by scr8p »

Asso_man! wrote:you're right Jason, except that the arm isn't longer, the "lever effect" being more or less the same :wink:
ya.... i didn't think that much into it before i replied.

wyldbill
Approved Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:03 pm
Location: birdsboro,pa
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer

Post by wyldbill »

hey scr8p, didnt the klein sprint cars use the losi/custom works hub carriers when they were using these arms? im not quite sure which ones they used because i've seen both the b4 and the losi ones used on local racers. wouldnt that take care of the problem, mabey?

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • 6 gear update to newer slipper clutch?
    by Twin Detonator » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    6 Replies
    1273 Views
    Last post by fredswain
  • Charging newer batteries
    by wmcwings » » in Modern Electronics
    14 Replies
    1572 Views
    Last post by Russ Winn
  • TC3 vs. newer TC5/6/7 or others
    by OldSchoolGuy » » in Associated On-Road Forum
    10 Replies
    324 Views
    Last post by OldSchoolGuy
  • RichieRich's still old but newer RC10
    by RichieRich » » in RC10 Buggy Forum
    75 Replies
    7098 Views
    Last post by Bo Wallen
  • Better Looking Bodies for Newer Buggies???
    by USAPaulo » » in 21st Century Modern
    11 Replies
    1458 Views
    Last post by USAPaulo
  • Toolmans Ten's/ newer pics,ones you can see
    by toolman72 » » in The Gallery
    1 Replies
    1144 Views
    Last post by toolman72
  • Newer brands of 1/12 Foams - what are your experiences etc.
    by drbelleville » » in R/C Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    0 Replies
    437 Views
    Last post by drbelleville
  • Old school Yokomo and the newer kits....
    by Hotrodvw » » in Yokomo Forum
    23 Replies
    2729 Views
    Last post by stickboy007

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No User AvatarGoogle [Bot], No User AvatarGoogle Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests