best current option for new .71 and 1.32 shock set

General info, Q&A.

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

strangersinspace
Approved Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:05 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

best current option for new .71 and 1.32 shock set

Post by strangersinspace »

There's a lot of older threads discussing this, but various parts have been discontinued over time. Anyone have recommendations for the best options for buying a new set of .71 / 1.32 set of shocks that actually match (or are close to matching aesthetically)? Do the 1.32 threaded RC10GT shocks work well on an RC10?

I'm wondering about these on the rear:
https://www.amainhobbies.com/team-associated-rear-threaded-shock-body-2-asc7415/p8149

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16734
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 1193 times

Re: best current option for new .71 and 1.32 shock set

Post by scr8p »

The only threaded .71 option are the V2's that came on the rere worlds car.

To match the bodies in your above link you would have to use .89 bodies from the b4 which requires a taller tower.

User avatar
mk-Zero
Business Member
Posts: 1678
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:14 pm
Location: Orange, CA
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: best current option for new .71 and 1.32 shock set

Post by mk-Zero »

Jeff at Factory Works has the towers you need to run the longer shocks.

strangersinspace
Approved Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:05 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Re: best current option for new .71 and 1.32 shock set

Post by strangersinspace »

Related question - can anyone confirm if the older 1.32 gold shock body part number 6424 is interchangeable with the newer RC10 Classic 1.32 shock body part number 6446? They appear to be identical from what information I can find.

bluewormx
Approved Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:56 am
Location: Spain
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: best current option for new .71 and 1.32 shock set

Post by bluewormx »

strangersinspace wrote: Sat Jul 07, 2018 9:51 pm Related question - can anyone confirm if the older 1.32 gold shock body part number 6424 is interchangeable with the newer RC10 Classic 1.32 shock body part number 6446? They appear to be identical from what information I can find.
Yes and no, Associated messed up the part numbers: Vintage 6424 is 1.32" top load shock body, vintage 6446 is bottom load shock body; rere 6446 is top load shock body.

Top load and bottom load have different seal spacers and hardware, o-rings are the same. The rest of the shock parts are all interchangeable.

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Temple's RC10 Tech Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests