Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

General info, Q&A.

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

twisted
Approved Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:19 pm
Location: New York

Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by twisted »

RC10 nose plate... let me ask this. Has anyone moved the front bulkhead/shock tower pieces forward more?

User avatar
GoMachV
Approved Member
Posts: 12183
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3729 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by GoMachV »

The entire plate? Yes...
Just the bulkheads further forward on the nose plate? No

twisted
Approved Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:19 pm
Location: New York

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by twisted »

I was thinking of doing just the bulkheads as i wouldnt have to get longer tubes.

User avatar
GoMachV
Approved Member
Posts: 12183
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3729 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by GoMachV »

Problem is the arms would sit higher so the car would sit lower. I heard someone ask a similar question recently and it makes sense, you would need a full wing arm to make it work.

You can use the second set of holes in the nose plate to get an extra 1/2". Brian has nose tubes he made to allow this, look on here in the Conklin design area. He made them for the Ten4 but they are the same and he sells them cheap.

RS Chris
Approved Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: Pasadena, TX
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by RS Chris »

Does the buggy chassis not have a second hole for the long wheelbase nose?
Current:RC10T, T3 FT, GT Blue Tub, GT FT, GT2 FT, GT5, RC28, SC28, Micro RS4.

Previous:B2, B3, B3 FT, 10T pink chassis, GT FT, TC3, TC3 FT, RS4MT
Tamiya TA02, Thunder Tiger TS4N pro, Kyosho VoneR, Emaxx, MX4, MP 7.5, 7.5 Kanai.

User avatar
GoMachV
Approved Member
Posts: 12183
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3729 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by GoMachV »

The nose plate did up till the worlds era. The problem was the nose brace tubes only have swb holes

RS Chris
Approved Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: Pasadena, TX
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by RS Chris »

Ahh I see. What about truck nose brace tubes? Same length? Does the chassis itself have two holes or just one?
Current:RC10T, T3 FT, GT Blue Tub, GT FT, GT2 FT, GT5, RC28, SC28, Micro RS4.

Previous:B2, B3, B3 FT, 10T pink chassis, GT FT, TC3, TC3 FT, RS4MT
Tamiya TA02, Thunder Tiger TS4N pro, Kyosho VoneR, Emaxx, MX4, MP 7.5, 7.5 Kanai.

User avatar
GoMachV
Approved Member
Posts: 12183
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3729 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by GoMachV »

chassis has one hole. Truck nose tubes are much shorter

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16731
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 1188 times

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by scr8p »

The factory nose tubes are plenty long enough to drill and tap new holes to run the nose plate in the long position (if you have the old style nose plate to do so, of course).

Also, Sassy's rc10 chassis had the arm mount holes drilled further forward on the kick-up, and Raborn's oval chassis had 2 set of holes to move the front suspension forward or back (stock position).

twisted
Approved Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:19 pm
Location: New York

Re: Nose plate question... Moving front bulkheads further

Post by twisted »

couldnt you just adjust ride height to compensate for the ride height change?

also if any one has done this what pros and cons did you see? i would think it would make the car a tad more stable in the rough and better approach angle on jumps.

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Temple's RC10 Tech Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests