
I finally found a home for the JCAR DDS tranny I've had for years. I also added a Reedy Mr. F's mod, HyperDrive belt-drive system and Holeshot SuperCooler:




It might end up with some Raborn rear arms and sliders, or some Andy's if I can find them.
Phin wrote:Perfect transmission choice but isn't the motor on the wrong side...or is it a reverse rotation motor?
but it's still on the wrong side if the motor's direction isn't reversed.fastang wrote:Phin wrote:Perfect transmission choice but isn't the motor on the wrong side...or is it a reverse rotation motor?
Its belt driven
Yup...which is why you have to flip the motor to the other side or reverse it's rotation.fastang wrote:...
Its belt driven
Makes more sense than an oval car that drives backwards.LTO_Dave wrote:...
And a big heavy motor hangin' off the right side of an oval car wouldn't really make much sense.![]()
Seem to be just a hair. Is there a reason they might want a bit of toe-out? Or, it was designed by M.C. Escher.scr8p wrote:i don't know if it's just an optical illusion, but are the "rear" rear arm mount holes closer together than the fronts (left to right)?
it's no different than clod busters. the rear motor needs to have it's direction reversed. you can set the timing at zero and rotate the endbell 180 degrees. then if you want to add the timing back, you crank the endbell towards the negative side.Phin wrote:I've only read it mentioned, but didn't racers used to flip the end bell inside mod motors to get it running in reverse?
well, i could see them wanting to get 0 rear toe, and i don't think 0 degree arm mounts were out when this chassis was made.THEYTOOKMYTHUMB wrote:Seem to be just a hair. Is there a reason they might want a bit of toe-out?scr8p wrote:i don't know if it's just an optical illusion, but are the "rear" rear arm mount holes closer together than the fronts (left to right)?
Yes they are. It's the first thing I noticed when I was sanding the chassis. I put a gold tub on top of the HD chassis and the rear holes are standard width, but the front holes are about 2-3mm wider. Since the HD chassis was intended for a mid-motor setup, could the hole difference be for the toe?scr8p wrote:i don't know if it's just an optical illusion, but are the "rear" rear arm mount holes closer together than the fronts (left to right)?
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: Tbot [Bot] and 11 guests