Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and parts

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

it's an insert not brazed. Yeah, I don't have too much experience with hardened material, it's probably a little bit of all things contributing, but rigidity/tool geometry is most likely, and you are right, it's probably easier to machine them new from fresh unhardened stock, and use something that is easily hardened post-machining.

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

Since I last replied to this thread, I had some time at the lathe, double checking all my machine settings, for tight gibs and proper tool geometry, etc. Happy to say that I managed to hit a sweet spot for the machine, and was able to spin up both left and right halves to use in a 2.25:1 trans. The trick to it was to bring the tool into the work at an angle, rather than straight in, of course it could be my cheap (probably chinese) inserts, and tool height was extremely critical. It did appear that the parts were either not as hard as I thought, or case hardened. I'll try and snap a pic tonight.

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

BTW, since these only cost around 5 bucks each, if they can be modified, it would cost way less than buying raw material and spending all the machining time at the going machine shop rates.

here is a crappy cell phone pic:
Attachments
2012-08-23_12-16-04_163.jpg

wyldbill
Approved Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:03 pm
Location: birdsboro,pa
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by wyldbill »

i have done that on aluminum outdrives before but never on stock steel ones.

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

yes, it look a little bit of learning curve to get it right, but it worked.

User avatar
Seabass
Business Member
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Mississippi
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by Seabass »

Looks good, yep that hardened steel needs a super rigid setup and the right tool position-height-spindle speed to cut properly.

Jake

User avatar
losiXXXman
Approved Member
Posts: 935
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:53 am
Location: Cary, NC
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by losiXXXman »

Couldn't the steel be unhardened before the machining, and then rehardened afterward? Isn't the hardening process done by heating and then fast quenching, and undone by heating and allowing to slowly cool? I could be way off, I got a little lazy during the last half of materials science 201 when they were talking ablaut triple point and crystal structure....

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

yes, you could, but the process isn't exactly simple, and I don't have a tempering oven. It's easier to use a carbide insert, and spend a little time working to make it cut properly. It really isn't very difficult once it's set up.

Plus, annealing and heat treating ruins the finish, so it would have to be refinished afterwards.

User avatar
askbob
Approved Member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:24 am
Location: KY
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by askbob »

jwscab wrote:BTW, since these only cost around 5 bucks each, if they can be modified, it would cost way less than buying raw material and spending all the machining time at the going machine shop rates.

here is a crappy cell phone pic:

Which outdrives are these orginally for?

Are the Dynotechs all sold out?

User avatar
Charlie don't surf
Approved Member
Posts: 9201
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
Location: USA
Has thanked: 245 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by Charlie don't surf »

2.40 B2/3

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

These outdrives are b4/t4.

justinspeed79
Approved Member
Posts: 1679
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: Houston Texas
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by justinspeed79 »

Have you used them? How did they work out?

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by jwscab »

I haven't put them in a trans to run, but i did a test build and they assemble fine and work as they should. The only real 'problem' that happens is you lose that little ridge on the outside of the diff ring. Most diffs in the industry have a flat surface for the diff rings anyway, so worst case, a drop of CA on the back side to help secure the rings would probably be fine.

kink
Approved Member
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:31 am
Location: UK, Surrey
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by kink »

This was another great tech thread. I was looking forward to the end seeing lots of cars running alloy transmission cases. Shame it did not pan out in the end. I wish you luck getting the project off the ground again.
GARBO 1/8

300D50
Approved Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:07 pm
Location: Central NY (Utica/Rome)
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Discussion about possible aluminum transmission and part

Post by 300D50 »

Expect an update within the next month, with a proposal for a group buy limited re-release.
Walt
Some people never have anything except ideas. Go do it.

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No User AvatarAmazon [Bot], No User AvatarCOZINATOR1960 and 10 guests