http://liverc.com/news/special_features/5345-LRC_EXCLUSIVE%3A_TLR_4WD_Spy_Shots!/
It looks like they've kept some of the same elements of the xx4. I think I need to start saving...

Not surprising considering they've all been running XX4's with big bore shocks recently, about time really. I bet the actual geometry is all pretty much the same too.Coelacanth wrote:So, a return to the mid-motor belt-driven 4WD from the late 80's. What's old is new again.
I agree with you guys....old is new but forced because ppl are expecting "new"...its almost like they've trained the herds to actually desire to give up all their money consistently...just look at the iphone crowds. their not bad phones but u dont need 40 revisions within a decade. same goes for all these apps.fredswain wrote:It basically looks like a XX4 drivetrain with a 22 suspension on an aluminum chassis. Close to that at least. People today complain if things aren't new and different because they feel that old is inferior regardless of design. No one questions new things anymore as long as they came from a big manufacturer. If Associated came out with a solid rear axle B5,
many people would believe its a better design because it's new. A good design is a good design regardless of age.
Unfortunately the worlds will be run on a sugared track which in my opinion completely invalidates any results. Ifmar died a decade ago. They've been irrelevant ever since.
They sugared the track at the warm up event because the tyres chosen for the event had no grip on the new dirt and until then whoever won would have been the one who had spun out the least. Part of the problem at the warm up is that the spec tyre was chosen before the track was built so they couldn't test different tyres on the track. At the 2007 Worlds finals the winner Neil Cragg ran a 14T motor and a 5 cell nimh pack to reduce power to stop his B4 spinning out. I'm sure the people complaining about sugaring the track will also complain if the track is left unprepared and the winner ends up running a 13.5T or 17.5T motor because they have to run that slow to get any grip.License2iLL wrote:Wow..i didnt know they did that. Well I guess it could be argued they are doing it to the whole field so it levels the results for everyone.....except we could argue they're not real world results since out here most probably dont run "sugared".
I think i prob agree with u that its not an accurate measurement of traction improvements in any of the modern designs if compared to old. Its relevant some.
Sorry but I disagree, to me it looks like these are new arms specific to the car, i am sure the EA3 arms didn't have the captured shock mounts at the bottom.JK Racing wrote:I've eyeballed those photos for quite a while since released. It actually has XXXCR rear EA3 arms on it, not 22.
I bet that the geometry is not that far off though!JK Racing wrote:I was looking at the mid-air under-chassis shot, from that picture, I will agree, new & specific.
terry.sc wrote:They sugared the track at the warm up event because the tyres chosen for the event had no grip on the new dirt and until then whoever won would have been the one who had spun out the least. Part of the problem at the warm up is that the spec tyre was chosen before the track was built so they couldn't test different tyres on the track. At the 2007 Worlds finals the winner Neil Cragg ran a 14T motor and a 5 cell nimh pack to reduce power to stop his B4 spinning out. I'm sure the people complaining about sugaring the track will also complain if the track is left unprepared and the winner ends up running a 13.5T or 17.5T motor because they have to run that slow to get any grip.License2iLL wrote:Wow..i didnt know they did that. Well I guess it could be argued they are doing it to the whole field so it levels the results for everyone.....except we could argue they're not real world results since out here most probably dont run "sugared".
I think i prob agree with u that its not an accurate measurement of traction improvements in any of the modern designs if compared to old. Its relevant some.
As for a XX4 running with 22 suspension, there's already a lot of XX4s that are running with XXX-CR VLA rear suspensions on them. Considering how competitive the XX4 still is, the new car looks like Losi have fixed the weak spots of the XX4 and added the currently fashionable alloy chassis to it. Hopefully the drivetrain will still be enclosed like the XX4, but a lot simpler to access for maintenance.
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests