A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:24 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 77 times
A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
I always wondered why there was a wheel base option on rc10s but the nose plate only had the one set of holes taped for use. Then to my surprise I noticed that my early edition which I am rebuilding had them tapped ready to go. There really is quite a lot of differences on the earlier cars. Also noticed that the shocks have an alloy spacer in there instead of the thicker plastic one too back to the nose but I wonder when they stopped tapping them.... Anyone?
peter
peter
- Ruffy
- Approved Member
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:49 pm
- Location: Orlando, Florida
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
Going to be hard to tell I think because I have very early no-stamp Edingers that are tapped, and also have Cadillacs as well as very late Stealth Transmission dated gold noseplates that are threaded as well. In fact, all of mine are threaded for both positions.
- scr8p
- Administrator
- Posts: 16727
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Northampton, PA
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 1178 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
Could it have something to do with roar rules or something like that? The long wheelbase setup would've been longer than allowed so they stopped tapping the holes to eliminate the option?
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:02 am
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 81 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
Edinger to Caddy kits. Seems like if you purchased a RC10 during the change over you get what they in stock at the time.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:24 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 77 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
Yeh maybe would have been a beast in long wheelbase mode especially with those kit fronts and slow servos back in the day maybe it was the 1/4 mile setup certainly wouldn't have liked hairpins, i remember seeing a pic of the early cars in england and i seemed quite popular to shorten the car by about 1cm and put spikes on the front for grass tracks.
peter
peter
scr8p wrote:could it have something to do with roar rules or something like that? the long wheelbase setup would've been longer than allowed so they stopped tapping the holes to eliminate the option?
- Ruffy
- Approved Member
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:49 pm
- Location: Orlando, Florida
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
I myself have 17 gold noseplates, stemming from the early no-stamp edinger RC10 ones, to late edinger, late cadillacs and even brand new in the bag ones that I got from AE as a Team Driver just after they released the B2, and all of mine are threaded for both positions. I forgot to include 3 of my RC10CE's that came with the stealth also are threaded in both positions.
- Asso_man!
- Approved Member
- Posts: 3960
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
- Location: EU
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
Note that the stock front tubes only had 1 position, which leads to think that the longer wheelbase has never been a real alternative. I honestly think that we have spotted all the differences between the early "Edinger" kits and the later models.
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable
- RC10resto
- Super Member
- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:26 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Has thanked: 1419 times
- Been thanked: 540 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
What about the early chassis difference, has that been noted 

- Charlie don't surf
- Approved Member
- Posts: 9181
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
Hmmm, I might have heard about that..........RC10resto wrote:What about the early chassis difference, has that been noted

-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:45 pm
- Location: East Texas
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
I've had about 10 or 12 and none have ever had both sets threaded. In fact, that is how I always knew which hole to put it in. (the screws... Get your mind out of the gutter)
- CamplinP
- Approved Member
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:43 pm
- Location: Midwest Husker, USA
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
I have 9 and 2 are threaded. No rime or reason either. One is on an all original short arm car and the other is on an original Team Car. Maby if they were behind on production they skipped this step.
The Fox, Falcon, 9 RC10s black/gold/graph, Optima Mid SE EXT, Losi XXXT, B3, B4, 3 T4s, Evader BX, Evader ST, Buggy Champ '09, Sand Scorcher '10, RC10T, RC10DS
-
- Regular Member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:45 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)
I know this is an old post, but I’m new on the forum. I’ll have to check that as I have an early no-stamp and just recently restored a CE. Hmmm.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 665 Views
-
Last post by teman
-
- 7 Replies
- 828 Views
-
Last post by Northy2
-
- 8 Replies
- 1884 Views
-
Last post by hugger19
-
- 18 Replies
- 3579 Views
-
Last post by transamman908
-
- 6 Replies
- 1148 Views
-
Last post by Ruffy
-
- 48 Replies
- 9084 Views
-
Last post by slotcarrod
-
- 21 Replies
- 4238 Views
-
Last post by yellowdatsun
-
- 5 Replies
- 1201 Views
-
Last post by RC10resto
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests