https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OGjovd9Qbk
It's very tempting. I don't have a Mopar in the collection and the 1:8 F150 Raptor needs some company.
So many projects, so little time.

PETG is stringy when wet. Have no issue if that type with PETG. You may have to dry it.GreenBar0n wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:29 pm I was figuring PLA was the cheapest and easiest way to do the body, and retain the details. I have yet to try any of the really strong/rigid filaments yet. PETG is stringy and the details can get fuzzy, in the limited experiments I've had so far.
Saw the magnetic bits on that kit, and wondered also. Would like to see the manual.
The build instructions are recommending PLA, wonder if they intend it to be very strong, or driven hard.silvertriple wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:34 pmPETG is stringy when wet. Have no issue if that type with PETG. You may have to dry it.GreenBar0n wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:29 pm I was figuring PLA was the cheapest and easiest way to do the body, and retain the details. I have yet to try any of the really strong/rigid filaments yet. PETG is stringy and the details can get fuzzy, in the limited experiments I've had so far.
Saw the magnetic bits on that kit, and wondered also. Would like to see the manual.
Those models are Interesting, but 3.5kg is a lot.
It's not because it new out of the sealed bag that it is dry, as per my experience, just saying... At the end, lot of elements can impact details. Yes PLA is much more easy to calibrate and to work with, in particular because it is less affected by hygroscopic factor...GreenBar0n wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:36 pm EDIT: Used a brand new roll, details were not as good as PLA, with PETG for the project I was working on.
The details for the parts I was working with, are what PETG was not looking as good compared to PLA for. Be that moisture, or whatever you want to attribute that to, I didn't require strength for that project, just the level of detail. PLA was better in that case.silvertriple wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:38 amIt's not because it new out of the sealed bag that it is dry, as per my experience, just saying... At the end, lot of elements can impact details. Yes PLA is much more easy to calibrate and to work with, in particular because it is less affected by hygroscopic factor...GreenBar0n wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:36 pm EDIT: Used a brand new roll, details were not as good as PLA, with PETG for the project I was working on.
I had heard using acetone will smooth those lines out, but will also diminish the details in the print, as a result of the melting/smoothing of the surface. I have yet to try it personally though.XLR8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 9:00 am The absorption rate for PLA does appear to be very low. Remnants from my first roll have been left in the printer for a couple months now and it's still pliable. I reckon it will make an acceptable print despite never have been dried.
PLA, however, isn't easy to sand to remove layer lines. Could ABS be a better choice for body panels? I'm aware there are warpage issues with styrene but it's very easy to smooth and prep for painting. Thoughts?
I've heard that as well so as a test, I brushed (flooded, actually) acetone directly on a scrap part and let it dry. The acetone appears to decreased the shine but the layer lines remain. This was PLA Basic from Bambu.GreenBar0n wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:51 pmI had heard using acetone will smooth those lines out, but will also diminish the details in the print, as a result of the melting/smoothing of the surface. I have yet to try it personally though.XLR8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 9:00 am The absorption rate for PLA does appear to be very low. Remnants from my first roll have been left in the printer for a couple months now and it's still pliable. I reckon it will make an acceptable print despite never have been dried.
PLA, however, isn't easy to sand to remove layer lines. Could ABS be a better choice for body panels? I'm aware there are warpage issues with styrene but it's very easy to smooth and prep for painting. Thoughts?
Again, it may linked with both experience, calibration and settings.GreenBar0n wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 8:49 pm The details for the parts I was working with, are what PETG was not looking as good compared to PLA for. Be that moisture, or whatever you want to attribute that to, I didn't require strength for that project, just the level of detail. PLA was better in that case.
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest