Coyote Rethink
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Coyote Rethink
Been thinking of this for a while. I've got a fair pile of Coyote transmission parts and I've already CAD modeled the Tag Pro10 suspension but I want to take it a little further, I'm planning on changing around the front suspension to give the arms a 15 degree angle and doing something else with the chassis to maybe lower the COG and give more battery options.
Anyway, I wanted to start with a proper CAD model of the stock chassis so I could be sure of the fit for the trans.
Anyway, I wanted to start with a proper CAD model of the stock chassis so I could be sure of the fit for the trans.
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- Mr. ED
- Approved Member
- Posts: 5483
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:30 am
- Location: Back @ home: Belgium
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
This has been waiting on my having two minutes for a while now but this is the next step , this adds 10 degrees kick to the front arms , its about as far as you can go while retaining some DNA , what I've done is modify the front bulkhead , the bulkhead behind the diff pumpkin and the top arm mount so the arms mount ten degrees rotated around the diff outdrive .
The chassis will need minor modification for the front bulkhead fittings and of course its bottom profile , in the last shot you can see how much of the chassis plate needs adapting as its pictured with an early style chassis mounted the other side of the diff , the diff position is unchanged so the transmission needs no modification . I've just noticed the front bulkhead needs further work to move the under guard screw mount up .If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- Mr. ED
- Approved Member
- Posts: 5483
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:30 am
- Location: Back @ home: Belgium
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
It's a bit of a challenge , I've just sorted most of it but it will need a guard under the rear screws for the bottom arms as they will be a lowest point , that's unavoidable though .
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- Mr. ED
- Approved Member
- Posts: 5483
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:30 am
- Location: Back @ home: Belgium
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
This was my thought exactly , probably Kydex .
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- Russ Winn
- Approved Member
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:52 am
- Location: Hillbilly Hell, Fl.
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 80 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
This looks to be a very technical project...Although I'm not familiar with a Coyote, based on the illustrations, it looks like Mr.Ed has the right idea about using the bumper as a guard. Seems to be several places to bolt one on.....I can't wait to see the progress on this!
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
If your not familiar with the SG or Tag Coyote they had front suspension arms that were absolutely flat to the ground , not uncommon for early cars , this part of the modification is to add that front kick up to the suspension .Russ Winn wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:50 am This looks to be a very technical project...Although I'm not familiar with a Coyote, based on the illustrations, it looks like Mr.Ed has the right idea about using the bumper as a guard. Seems to be several places to bolt one on.....I can't wait to see the progress on this!
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
A little chassis rectification to fit the suspension mods and the top arm/shock mount modified to be able to mount a shock tower .
Ultimately the chassis may look very different as I'm thinking of moving the motor to one side , the battery to the other and using a mostly two deck chassis , upper and lower in a more modern way possibly with just vestiges of the stock left ,right chassis plates . Not sure yet as that may change the DNA too much for my liking .If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
Test print of parts , the chassis plate is only the front section and the cut is a vertical cut so you can use it as reference.
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Coyote Rethink
Started the major chassis mods , the aim is to lay the motor to one side rather than have it right up top in order to lower the centre of gravity , the battery will be a standard shape and lay flat on the opposite side and more centrally , as close to the prop shaft as possible in order to balance the motor weight as best as possible . The motor mount is also adapted but with a view to maintaining the DNA as far as possible.
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 18 Replies
- 9202 Views
-
Last post by Wazza22
-
- 7 Replies
- 2491 Views
-
Last post by prp
-
- 16 Replies
- 5246 Views
-
Last post by Nomadfish
-
- 49 Replies
- 11842 Views
-
Last post by 1300GT
-
- 11 Replies
- 3790 Views
-
Last post by prp
-
- 13 Replies
- 2616 Views
-
Last post by BattleTrak
-
- 4 Replies
- 1808 Views
-
Last post by Seabass
-
- 12 Replies
- 2831 Views
-
Last post by GotXjaG
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests