Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I got a new to me car recently and it's all clean and polished and right off would look good on the shelf , however on close inspection two of the three diffs are screwed and the whole steering system would drop apart the moment it started moving . This is not a rant ,it was the right price but clearly built for display , it just got me thinking do people build differently for shelf or to run ?
My feeling in my mind is a Shelf Queen should be immaculate throughout , ready to run if fitted with electrics where as a Runner needs to be mechanically serviceable but with maybe more non original parts or scruffy original parts .
So how do you feel about a Shelf Queen that's in an un-runable condition , it would just feel like a job unfinished to me.
My feeling in my mind is a Shelf Queen should be immaculate throughout , ready to run if fitted with electrics where as a Runner needs to be mechanically serviceable but with maybe more non original parts or scruffy original parts .
So how do you feel about a Shelf Queen that's in an un-runable condition , it would just feel like a job unfinished to me.
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- juicedcoupe
- Super Member
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:05 pm
- Location: Pascagoula, MS
- Has thanked: 264 times
- Been thanked: 2007 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
Personally, I don't build shelf queens. Even my cars that I don't intend to run are fully functional. All my cars have functional electronics and all the shocks have oil in them.
Always looking for new and interesting ways to waste money.
- Frankentruck
- Super Member
- Posts: 3642
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 9:59 am
- Location: Texas, USA
- Has thanked: 2477 times
- Been thanked: 2782 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I've never liked assembling anything that's not functional. That feels like I just gave up on it.
Frankensteined RC10T3 / Franky Jr RC10GT-e (x2) / A+ stamp / Toy Story RC / Graphite replica / B1.5 BFG 5LTi / Clonewald / Hyper Hornet
"I love the effort, but it sure looks like you took the long way around to a tub again"
"I love the effort, but it sure looks like you took the long way around to a tub again"
- winner_evo
- Approved Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:27 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I concur with the other members, the majority of my cars are shelfers but they are all functional & set up to run with painted bodies. If there are faults with them that would affect running, I would consider them unfinished.
- morrisey0
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:45 pm
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Has thanked: 74 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I have been leaning more towards what I like to call Shelf Runners. I like the look of how they looked when the original owners had them, and used them, and took care of them. Not gems, but certainly not ragged out. Just sitting on the shelf waiting until its next outing. I don't run them much, but that is the look I like the best.
I have a couple of Shelf Queens that have never been run, and TBH, I am not going to be the one to do it. Clear bodies so you can appreciate the mechanics. Yes, they look unfinished, but I am just fine with that.
Then there are the runners. They all get a place on a shelf, but these are the ones that I don't really care about the looks of. They are for fun.
I have a couple of Shelf Queens that have never been run, and TBH, I am not going to be the one to do it. Clear bodies so you can appreciate the mechanics. Yes, they look unfinished, but I am just fine with that.
Then there are the runners. They all get a place on a shelf, but these are the ones that I don't really care about the looks of. They are for fun.
I build RCs like people would have done back in the '90s ..................................... if they had 3D printers.
- R6cowboy
- Super Member
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:06 pm
- Location: Mendota, IL
- Has thanked: 818 times
- Been thanked: 849 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
My feeling is the same. Even if it's intended purpose is to be a self queen, it should still be fully functional and built correct, otherwise it's not complete.
-Jerry-
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I'm happy to hear that everybody so far agrees, even if you never want to run it then it should still built as if it were, it would make my brain itch otherwise. 

If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- R6cowboy
- Super Member
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:06 pm
- Location: Mendota, IL
- Has thanked: 818 times
- Been thanked: 849 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I'd lose sleep at night if I had a shelver on display which was purposely built with missing parts/hardware where it was unable to function properly if needed.
-Jerry-
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1203 times
- Been thanked: 598 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
So far I haven’t built a shelf queen, but I absolutely would put the lowest quality parts in one.
Think of all of the high quality parts that can keep runners going that are sitting on a shelf waiting to be thrown into the garbage in perfect condition once the owner dies.
For a shelf queen I would take knicked old shock shafts and polish them pretty, place them in the shock without seals or oil. Why oil up shocks for the seals to eventually swell and rot due to disuse?
I would clean up transmission internals but all my worst parts would go inside. Why put the pristine out drives on a car that won’t use them?
That’s just personal. I get why people want to build it right but for me the cars are meant to be kinetic sculpture. The parts are there for it to perform in a specific way. If you remove the performance aspect there isn’t a purpose for the parts.
Maybe I would make a car entirely out of dhawk parts for the shelf. That would make sense to me. Since they look really pretty.
I am without doubt the minority on this thread.
Think of all of the high quality parts that can keep runners going that are sitting on a shelf waiting to be thrown into the garbage in perfect condition once the owner dies.
For a shelf queen I would take knicked old shock shafts and polish them pretty, place them in the shock without seals or oil. Why oil up shocks for the seals to eventually swell and rot due to disuse?
I would clean up transmission internals but all my worst parts would go inside. Why put the pristine out drives on a car that won’t use them?
That’s just personal. I get why people want to build it right but for me the cars are meant to be kinetic sculpture. The parts are there for it to perform in a specific way. If you remove the performance aspect there isn’t a purpose for the parts.
Maybe I would make a car entirely out of dhawk parts for the shelf. That would make sense to me. Since they look really pretty.
I am without doubt the minority on this thread.
- R6cowboy
- Super Member
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:06 pm
- Location: Mendota, IL
- Has thanked: 818 times
- Been thanked: 849 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
Suppose it could depend on what you're building. I really like morrisey's term calling them shelf runners, as if it were me, anything that was mainly a "shelf queen" would slightly be used and maintained to avoid mentioned issues of disuse. For instance, the Factory Team T4 I'm building. If it were to be built using the cheapest lowest quality parts available, it really couldn't be considered a Factory Team version of the truck.
I can't speak for others, but I don't plan on having any rc's just laying around waiting to be thrown in the trash upon my death. Ideally, they'll all be handed down or sold well before I kick the bucket.
I can't speak for others, but I don't plan on having any rc's just laying around waiting to be thrown in the trash upon my death. Ideally, they'll all be handed down or sold well before I kick the bucket.

-Jerry-
- juicedcoupe
- Super Member
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:05 pm
- Location: Pascagoula, MS
- Has thanked: 264 times
- Been thanked: 2007 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
Cars that I don't really intend to run much do tend to get electronics that I also wouldn't use in a runner. I'd never subject a 30+ year old esc to runner duty, but leaving it laying around in a box doesn't seem right either.
Always looking for new and interesting ways to waste money.
- jwscab
- Approved Member
- Posts: 6570
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Chalfont, PA
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I build chassis's and they are either to run, or not. The difference is on ones I'm not running, I will leave out shock oil other than a few drops, and usual electronics unless I have a nice system to put in for a replica or similar.
So in order to run any car I would outfit electronics and add shock oil.
Now, some cars are put together with pieces I would rather not run, but they are assembled to be ready.
Also some chassis's are so sweet, I would rather not put a body on them to admire the assembly.
So in order to run any car I would outfit electronics and add shock oil.
Now, some cars are put together with pieces I would rather not run, but they are assembled to be ready.
Also some chassis's are so sweet, I would rather not put a body on them to admire the assembly.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
Strangely I understand using unserviceable electronics to complete the aesthetics and I have no trouble with a clear body so the chassis is exposed to view but I feel we are restoring these cars, even the runner's, I guess if you look at them as art or sculpture then that's different, and I guess if it has the just off the track warts and all racer look, maybe your old car or a famous one, again it's a different thing as the scars are memories.
The thing is everybody has a different dream about these things.
The thing is everybody has a different dream about these things.
If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
- TRX-1-3
- Approved Member
- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:13 pm
- Location: USAG Humphreys, South Korea
- Has thanked: 1935 times
- Been thanked: 941 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
I built my shelf dweller to be ready and/or have the appearance of being ready to drop a battery pack into and be driveable. For example, the shocks are all full and it has electronics in it but also for example, the speedo is untested and I don't keep a transmitter all ready to go either. I understand the appeal of a clear body and have done that myself in the past but I prefer painted bodies and displaying it either on or off. I definately like scarfing an eyleoad with the body off most of the time though.
But really we are just a bunch of weidos that like old toy cars
But really we are just a bunch of weidos that like old toy cars

Hope you're doin' something fun.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:21 pm
- Location: Guildford UK
- Has thanked: 2697 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Built for the Shelf Versus built to Run
Ha ha yup, we are a splinter of a minority group of weirdos! So whether every bit of alloy has to be mirror polished, you need your carbon fibre weave to be diagonal, or you like em grubby, we are all old men playing with toy cars.

If a jobs not worth doing then its certainly not worth doing well.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
A problem shared is a problem halved but an advantage shared is no advantage at all.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 10 Replies
- 2587 Views
-
Last post by RCveteran
-
- 5 Replies
- 2010 Views
-
Last post by RedScampi
-
- 8 Replies
- 1649 Views
-
Last post by Eau Rouge
-
- 8 Replies
- 1779 Views
-
Last post by RCveteran
-
- 11 Replies
- 1490 Views
-
Last post by Mr. ED
-
- 15 Replies
- 1496 Views
-
Last post by faceman2k
-
- 1 Replies
- 435 Views
-
Last post by bearrickster
-
- 2 Replies
- 561 Views
-
Last post by Brandon G
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: juicedcoupe and 9 guests