

P.S; David Poulter was also running a TeamC TM2 - last night was only the 2nd time that he had run it!
Was the dirt track loose or hard pack/high grip? Would be interested to hear how it did & what kind of set up the guy was running... I've only ever run mine TM2 on high grip surfaces & its been great, but all the discussion on the forums is talking about modifcations to increase rear end traction when conditions get wet/slippery.JK Racing wrote:had one of these cars in hand last night, running here is SoCal, on a dirt track...did pretty darn good too.
Doh! I've seen a few people do that!!JK Racing wrote:he didnt run the main, he rebuilt the diff and dropped it in backwards![]()
Hi Fred,fredswain wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:23 pm Dan yeah I saw your message. I can't believe how long that thing is. 292mm is the extreme ROAR limit. That's 11-1/2". I've never seen a car that long that didn't have a full party of people in the back!
I am building my own 2wd car that will be very similar to this one. I am using a B44 rear half and a B4 front half. I have a couple of options on mine since the 2 front to rear drive shafts are different lengths and I can choose to build around either of them. I am going to mount the shorty lipo and motor as far rearwards as possible like the greyseal B44 from Team Azarashi which is farther rearwards than the TM2. Combining this with a long wheelbase and the B44 weight kit between the motor and battery under the driveshaft and I should be able to get about 68% weight on the rear wheels. With no antisquat I don't forsee any issues with running the car in lower traction situations.
When I started playing with mid motor cars a couple of years ago I found that traction, both forwards and side bite, is based on how much weight is on the drive wheels and not where the motor is located. Mid motor cars have far less weight on the rear wheels than rear motor cars and as a result they suffer on lower traction tracks. The 4 gear setups cause weight to shift rearwards during acceleration but this creates far too many other problems in my opinion. Weight shifts off of the wheels that steer and off of the rear during hard deceleration which causes braking to be less effective. It still doesn't fix the issue of side bite going into corners on looser tracks since that is solely weight dependent. Basically as far as I'm concerned everyone who is building mid motor cars with a 4 gear setup is doing it wrong. The real key is to remove artificial weight transfer from the drivetrain and motor and let weight and tuning take over. This is where this layout comes in and why I think it'll be the future when everyone finally figures out they are doing it wrong.
I am building my own chassis so I am going to try out several different wheelbase lengths and different weight balances. I'm pretty sure there won't be a surface that this setup will ultimately not work well on and it will drive far more neutral than any other orientation.
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest