gomachv wrote:I am surprised Tim still comes around after all the bashing we give him

I hope he understands how much we appreciate him being the scapegoat!
I am surprised also. He must have small children at home to have the patience level it needs to deal with "all this dissapointment" and for that I thank you for sticking with us Tim

.
There is a difference between having an issue and taking care of it and just whining. Seems like alot of people just don't understand that 'for the money' you are buying a 30 year old kit that needed a little massaging to get right...just as they did 30 years ago.
RC10resto wrote:From what I have read the problems are not design issues but QC issues.
exactly! Without going back 60 pages I'm just gonna pull up a few recent ones but realize this isn't directed personally at these guys so don't take it this way but if you have an axle that doesn't fit a bearing sand it. If a bearing isn't right replace it. If the top shaft doesn't fit make it fit.
mikea96 wrote:For me I like the hand fitting of parts and the challenge of making everything work smoothly!
This is what its all about for me too. Some people call these modeling kits...not so. These are an rc kit that does more than just sit statically on a shelf (well some do but the parts still move as if they cold do more

) .
I don't mean it as a slam but if you expect a bunch of pieces just to fall together and be useable maybe a RTR is your speed.
Now, back to the part I like. If you have a problem with it I wanna know how you fixed it(great pix and info by the way abailey21). There are those out there that will run into the same issues and would like to have more than just dissappointment to read about in here so they can
abailey21 wrote: adapt and overcome.
{stepping off my soapbox}Thanx
Todd