Shock problems ????
- knixdad
- Approved Member
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Califon, New Jersey
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Shock problems ????
With the shocks done per the current manual or even using 3 spacers vs. 2, the rear arms are being stopped by the dogbone hitting the arms.
Switching to the fuel tubing to get full droop to be about 2 mm between the dogbone and arm.
Switching to the fuel tubing to get full droop to be about 2 mm between the dogbone and arm.
I miss brushed motors in that hazy, everything seemed better when I was a kid, kind of way.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: Shock problems ????
i opened up my shocks and put 5/8" of fuel tubing on the shafts. its no good to build them per the manual.
also drilled the new front tower holes, so much better. i just used an old tower as a template, but i think i coulda dropped the hole a 1/16" or even 1/8" lower and it would have been just right. i still have a little bit of room left in the shock before the arm contacts the tower.
also drilled the new front tower holes, so much better. i just used an old tower as a template, but i think i coulda dropped the hole a 1/16" or even 1/8" lower and it would have been just right. i still have a little bit of room left in the shock before the arm contacts the tower.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:43 pm
- Location: Syracuse, NY
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Shock problems ????
I bought a CE off eBay about a month ago and it had one badly bent dogbone, and the other is probably tweaked too but I didn't look too closely. The stock shocks were built correctly, but he had installed shocks from a B4, which were presumably built without limiters (I haven't opened them up yet).SnoopMaxx wrote:Yeah that's how I bent a cvd axle on my CE, cos I lost a spacer while rushing a shock rebuild between heatsRichieRich wrote:Heim joint? I just learned something new today. I just realized my front shocks were binding too and spinning the joint 180 degrees fixed it. Also, I built the rear shocks with the 3 spacers. It appears that if you don't use the limiters, the travel is stopped by the dogbone?
What is a good distance? I took my shock tower off this weekend and will try and drill the new holes tonight.badhoopty wrote: also drilled the new front tower holes, so much better. i just used an old tower as a template, but i think i coulda dropped the hole a 1/16" or even 1/8" lower and it would have been just right. i still have a little bit of room left in the shock before the arm contacts the tower.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: Shock problems ????
i cant remember things very well... i'll try to measure the o.g. tower lower hole.SteveK wrote:I bought a CE off eBay about a month ago and it had one badly bent dogbone, and the other is probably tweaked too but I didn't look too closely. The stock shocks were built correctly, but he had installed shocks from a B4, which were presumably built without limiters (I haven't opened them up yet).SnoopMaxx wrote:Yeah that's how I bent a cvd axle on my CE, cos I lost a spacer while rushing a shock rebuild between heatsRichieRich wrote:Heim joint? I just learned something new today. I just realized my front shocks were binding too and spinning the joint 180 degrees fixed it. Also, I built the rear shocks with the 3 spacers. It appears that if you don't use the limiters, the travel is stopped by the dogbone?
What is a good distance? I took my shock tower off this weekend and will try and drill the new holes tonight.badhoopty wrote: also drilled the new front tower holes, so much better. i just used an old tower as a template, but i think i coulda dropped the hole a 1/16" or even 1/8" lower and it would have been just right. i still have a little bit of room left in the shock before the arm contacts the tower.
iirc it was a tick over 1/8". just enough to be able to drill the new hole without drilling into the existing hole.
Re: Shock problems ????
Its at or just over 1/8" as you said. I measured my original RC10 I bought new and a used A stamp chassis, both read just about 1/8". Depending on which hole was used, its slighlty larger than the un-used one. The gap between the holes is measuring in at a measly .028" or so. Not much material between the holes.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: Shock problems ????
i drilled my new one exactly to the old one, and at full compression i still have a tick of shock travel. if i was to do it again, id go like 3/16" below the original hole instead of mirroring the original tower.drewbush wrote:Its at or just over 1/8" as you said. I measured my original RC10 I bought new and a used A stamp chassis, both read just about 1/8". Depending on which hole was used, its slighlty larger than the un-used one. The gap between the holes is measuring in at a measly .028" or so. Not much material between the holes.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 568 Views
-
Last post by Tadracket
-
- 17 Replies
- 1940 Views
-
Last post by RC10 Junkie
-
- 12 Replies
- 1375 Views
-
Last post by RC10th
-
- 1 Replies
- 612 Views
-
Last post by RC10Eh
-
- 3 Replies
- 1704 Views
-
Last post by blubblood
-
- 7 Replies
- 709 Views
-
Last post by tulsa
-
- 3 Replies
- 582 Views
-
Last post by Dr. Robotnik
-
- 14 Replies
- 1492 Views
-
Last post by klavy69
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests