Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Everything pertaining to the RC10 buggy re-releases.
Classic, Classic Clear, World's, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

User avatar
flipwils11
Approved Member
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:30 pm
Location: St Paul, MN
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by flipwils11 »

I'll just keep my 2 kits sealed NIB then, that way I never have to have my dreams of perfect quality dashed by filing/fitting/fiddling which leads to whining.

Just look at what happens when I get frustrated with poor quality parts! :oops: :mrgreen:

http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=25582&

User avatar
klavy69
Moderator
Posts: 5204
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 4:11 pm
Location: Fulton, IL (Land of one stop light but we DO have a windmill!)
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 294 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by klavy69 »

gomachv wrote:I didn't even open mine. I used motor oil like the good old days
don't forget about the option of koolaid in the shocks :mrgreen:
Peace and professionlism.....Kabunga signing off!!!

User avatar
GoMachV
Approved Member
Posts: 12184
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 3729 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by GoMachV »

I have also heard that ketchup and other condiments were used!

User avatar
knixdad
Approved Member
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Califon, New Jersey
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by knixdad »

gomachv wrote:I didn't even open mine. I used motor oil like the good old days
I was naughty also, except I used Losi shock oil. I also made my own servo linkage because using the old z bend stuff is just way too OG for me.
I miss brushed motors in that hazy, everything seemed better when I was a kid, kind of way.

isobarik
Approved Member
Posts: 617
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:09 am
Location: Sweden
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by isobarik »

agree with others here whats with the whining ???

mvh isobarik

User avatar
ra272
Approved Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:32 am
Location: NANCY FRANCE
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by ra272 »

Nobody else have massive play on the rear wheels due to ovalised bearing carriers?

SteveK
Approved Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by SteveK »

My rear wheels do seem pretty sloppy, but it's so far down on the list of issues I haven't even looked at it.

I haven't had the time this past week, my nephew was in town and it's like chasing a monkey around the house with him there, but when I do I plan to put together an email to Associated about this whole thing.

LTJohnM
Regular Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by LTJohnM »

yep, they are loose as heck! The rear hubs allow the bearings to flop around. I ran some CA around the outside of the ball bearing race to thicken it slightly. (careful not to get any in the bearing races!) Let it dry...... And it fits snug now. So far so good. It won't last forever though....

User avatar
knixdad
Approved Member
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Califon, New Jersey
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by knixdad »

My rear bearings were snug.

Maybe there is some way we can figure out production runs. My kit only had tight fits for the front c hubs as an issue.

Stuck in Alabama until Thursday so I can't inspect my box.
I miss brushed motors in that hazy, everything seemed better when I was a kid, kind of way.

SnoopMaxx
Approved Member
Posts: 699
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:38 pm
Location: Vraa Denmark
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by SnoopMaxx »

Mine are snug as well
Morten Max

User avatar
markbt73
Approved Member
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:04 pm
Location: Portland, OR USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by markbt73 »

All of this had me curious, so I went ahead and broke the seal on my kit, even though I won't get around to building it for quite a while. The chassis is certainly not as nice as the B and C stamps I have. Mine definitely has the pinches by the rear arm mounts; in fact it's so bad that the aluminum is sort of rolled over the top. I will file it down and make it work, but it's not pretty. My old ones look the same from the bottom (sort of curled up), but are flat on the top.

And the anodizing on my shocks is gorgeous, and the nose plate and motor plate are pretty nice, but the chassis is sort of blotchy, almost like they didn't leave it in long enough, or maybe didn't clean it well enough. It's darker around the edges than it is in the middle.

But I'm not going to complain or write to Associated or anything; when I have time, I'm just going to build it, trimming and shimming and cleaning up as need be, and go run the snot out of it. My B-stamp white-parts CE just became my official shelf queen, scratches and all. The re-re will be the runner.

kink
Approved Member
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:31 am
Location: UK, Surrey
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by kink »

markbt73 wrote:The re-re will be the runner.
I think that is the way everyone is going to have to look at this. Ok so the rere is clearly not as well made or desirable as the originals. So just thrash them into the ground and enjoy it care free. Keep your original RC10s for the long term collection and pride of place shelf queen duties.
GARBO 1/8

R/Cat
Approved Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 12:14 am
Location: NJ, USA
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by R/Cat »

markbt73 wrote:All of this had me curious, so I went ahead and broke the seal on my kit, even though I won't get around to building it for quite a while. The chassis is certainly not as nice as the B and C stamps I have. Mine definitely has the pinches by the rear arm mounts; in fact it's so bad that the aluminum is sort of rolled over the top. I will file it down and make it work, but it's not pretty. My old ones look the same from the bottom (sort of curled up), but are flat on the top.

And the anodizing on my shocks is gorgeous, and the nose plate and motor plate are pretty nice, but the chassis is sort of blotchy, almost like they didn't leave it in long enough, or maybe didn't clean it well enough. It's darker around the edges than it is in the middle.

But I'm not going to complain or write to Associated or anything; when I have time, I'm just going to build it, trimming and shimming and cleaning up as need be, and go run the snot out of it. My B-stamp white-parts CE just became my official shelf queen, scratches and all. The re-re will be the runner.

I did the same to check out the areas of concern mentioned on this forum and the pinched areas near the rear arm mounts are there but look to be well within normal limits based on the pics I've seen of best and worst-case scenario. All holes in the chassis are countersunk as well and the shocks look beautiful. At a quick glance the chassis anodizing does look a bit dull compared to some of the other parts but I'll be able to get a better look when I have everything out of its plastic bags. Not building it for a while.
Image

User avatar
THE H.P FREAK
Approved Member
Posts: 1000
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:12 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by THE H.P FREAK »

HI!... No problems with mine except I found that both body mount posts were way too short even after placing several washers under them. I ended up using longer vintage ones with the front one still getting a 1/4 thick spacer under it.

Image
102 RC vehicles and counting...

badhoopty
Approved Member
Posts: 3876
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 169 times
Been thanked: 151 times

Re: Pretty lousy quality for $250.00

Post by badhoopty »

ra272 wrote:Nobody else have massive play on the rear wheels due to ovalised bearing carriers?
my rear wheels have a good bit of play...

i never even realized they were so sloppy until i read a couple posts and decided to wiggle them the other night.

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “RC10 Buggy Re-Release Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests