Worlds Chassis Question

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

User avatar
myfordcnc
Approved Member
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:10 am
Location: Stockton, CA.
Been thanked: 1 time

Worlds Chassis Question

Post by myfordcnc »

I've never seen one in person and I guess I haven't seen it (or more probably never paid attention) on the pics of other world's chassis, but is this narrowing of the rear end, stock or a later modification? And what is the reasoning behind it? I guess I'm asking what I'm looking at.
Attachments
Worlds chassis 1.JPG
Worlds chassis 1.JPG (18.93 KiB) Viewed 1338 times
Worlds chassis 1.JPG
Worlds chassis 1.JPG (18.93 KiB) Viewed 1338 times

User avatar
GoMachV
Approved Member
Posts: 12163
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Has thanked: 1076 times
Been thanked: 3699 times

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by GoMachV »

Different "worlds car"

The associated worlds car was still the standard rear width

Rpm sold a worlds conversion which is what you see there. It could be added to any rc10. The front was a narrow truck style bulkhead and long Arms, and the rear was new longer arms and a template to cut the chassis
It's time to stand up to the bully. Support the companies that support the industry, not the ones that tear it down. Say no to Traxxas
Factory Works website

User avatar
myfordcnc
Approved Member
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:10 am
Location: Stockton, CA.
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by myfordcnc »

Ok, So the idea was, what to reduce weight? Because if RPM was making the arms couldn't they just have made them to the length they wanted. Instead of having the customer cut in to their chassis? Or was it just a marketing tactic to show " hey look at you your modifying for racing" Whats the advantage? If any. I think it looks cool but any real race tech there?

mikea96
Approved Member
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: Puyallup, WA
Has thanked: 599 times
Been thanked: 856 times

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by mikea96 »

The idea was to have longer arms to help the car handle better like how the newer cars are.

User avatar
myfordcnc
Approved Member
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:10 am
Location: Stockton, CA.
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by myfordcnc »

Ya , but why narrow the chassis. the arms would be longer still if the chassis was full width. Were they adapting older too long arms?

Chris00gt
Approved Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:23 pm
Location: Felton, PA

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by Chris00gt »

RPM had a complete worlds car. The arms could be installed on a pan car if you install a rc10t front bulk head and narrow the rear chassis like your pic. Here is a pic of the Rc10 RPM world car upside down vs my RC10 graphite.

Image
NEW: SC10 4x4 FT, SC10 FT, (2)T4.1 FT, B4.1 World
OLD RC10's: (4)Worlds, Graphite Team Car, (2)RPM Ultra's, Tekin, B2 Team Car, B3, (3)Champ Editions, Team Car, (2)RC10T Team Truck
Tamiya: Hornet, Fox
Bolink: Invader
Losi: (2)XX, Junior 2, JRX Pro SE

mikea96
Approved Member
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: Puyallup, WA
Has thanked: 599 times
Been thanked: 856 times

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by mikea96 »

myfordcnc wrote:Ya , but why narrow the chassis. the arms would be longer still if the chassis was full width. Were they adapting older too long arms?
Because they were made to work with the offset of the wheels of that time without going past the max width allowed!

User avatar
myfordcnc
Approved Member
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:10 am
Location: Stockton, CA.
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by myfordcnc »

Ah, got it so they were adapting for it to be used on chassis other than their own make. That makes sense. Also, thinking about it, having the pivot point of the arms as close to the center as possible (logical extreme would be dead center?) would make the car more responsive. quicker to shift its weight. Probably also made it harder to drive. So meant for the pros most likely. Accurate? I'm not a racer so just thinking out loud.

User avatar
Charlie don't surf
Approved Member
Posts: 9182
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
Location: USA
Has thanked: 220 times
Been thanked: 322 times

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by Charlie don't surf »

Longer arms, with equal length camberlinks actually slow down suspension speeds and transition speeds, making it "plush". That suspension package was designed by AE for the 91' Worlds prototype, and RPM copied the suspension design and sold it

cole455
Approved Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:48 am
Location: Winston salem, nc

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by cole455 »

Isn't that car on eBay right now?
Very modest, personable genius moonlighting as an airline pilot; looking for position as millionaire international playboy. Note: would prefer position where I don't have to bring my own million...

User avatar
GreenHell
Approved Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:48 pm
Location: Detroit
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Worlds Chassis Question

Post by GreenHell »

"All I wanted was a Pepsi..."

My Gallery | My Feedback | Rapid_RC

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests