YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

The place for all things Yokomo.

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

Post Reply
BloodClod
Approved Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:10 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by BloodClod »

Hi guys,

I've been wondering if it's worth going to a twin shock front setup for the 834B. What do you guys generally think of the performance of the monoshock up front? Should it be set to sit at full extention when the car is at rest or should there be some droop?

There doesn't seem to be any damping action when the car sometimes shifts it's weight from side to side as the monoshock justs moves with the rest of the suspension without compression.

Just wondering if the monoshock design has been working well for you or if anyone has any tips to maximize this design. :)

Thanks.

DW911
Approved Member
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:35 pm

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by DW911 »

No real comparison .....dual shocks are far better in my opinion :)

tiger1
Approved Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:38 pm
Location: Singapore
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by tiger1 »

My understanding is that mid 80s Japanese cars has almost no droop, it was not in their dictionary.

User avatar
Mr. ED
Approved Member
Posts: 5478
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:30 am
Location: Back @ home: Belgium
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by Mr. ED »

tiger1 wrote:My understanding is that mid 80s Japanese cars has almost no droop, it was not in their dictionary.
Maybe the shock travel was so small they'd sit onthe floor if droop was added :wink:

BloodClod
Approved Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:10 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by BloodClod »

lol... thanks guys. :)

I'll try a dual shock setup if time allows (getting a few cars prepped for a local vintage event).

Any advice on what's the best way to setup a monoshock - zero droop really?

I was thinking to ensure that the length of a fully extended shock maxes out the suspension travel and for the spring to be applying (at least) minimal pressure at full extension - this should apply some pressure to the suspension at all times. The car would still have some droop.

User avatar
Jirka
Approved Member
Posts: 792
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:40 am
Location: Europe
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by Jirka »

I don't remember anymore why, but at 1989 worlds at least US Yokomo drivers used monoshock at front.
Monoshock Yokomo from 1989WC.JPG
Monoshock Yokomo from 1989WC.JPG (39.65 KiB) Viewed 1279 times
Monoshock Yokomo from 1989WC.JPG
Monoshock Yokomo from 1989WC.JPG (39.65 KiB) Viewed 1279 times
Similar system was also in use with Race Prep drivers cars, but it used two shocks. The front shock tower was able to swing. In pic below the two aluminium screw did lock that that system, so it was not in use. The car is from 1991 ROAR nats.
Mike Dunns lazer.JPG
Jirka

tiger1
Approved Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:38 pm
Location: Singapore
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by tiger1 »

Bloodclod: you know I love to maintain the monoshock set up in my 834B.

However, with or without droop, these monoshock set up is frankly a flop :mrgreen:

There barely work... :lol:

michi
Approved Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:54 am
Location: Steinen Germany

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by michi »

:lol: someone mounted a monoshock at the best car of its time? I would also love to know why ! Thanks for the photos by the way. I love these old articles, especially if unusual designs are shown.

tiger1
Approved Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:38 pm
Location: Singapore
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by tiger1 »

Michi: I also love those old magazine articles, many interesting/funny/silly ideas :)

I think the monoshock was an idea of mis-understanding. :lol:

Among the first to feature monoshock was FS of super champ. The more famous one were 834B, hotshot, etc..

It was around 1985 that mugen, tamiya, yokomo, even hirobo all came up with 1/10 buggies with monoshocks. RC10 has 4 shocks all along, even MIP monoshock mod at the front did not really pick up. I think the reason was: it did not work as good as 2 shocks at the front in the original rc10 design.

It seems that back then, the understanding of the need of droop was not in the Japanese tool box. (while rc10, the US camp has better understanding of it) There was also little practical needs, off-road, even at the world were just hard packed smooth dirt road. Unlike later on, off road = crazy jump, double and triple and so on :roll:

With monoshock, as one side is compressed, the otherside got pushed down as a result of weight transfer (would call it a pseudo 'droop'). So to answer the question of Bloodclod, may be there is really no practical need or functional advantage of incorporating droop into the front monoshock in the 834b. May be the only exception is when there is a very effective anti-roll bar... :D

One the downside, monoshock, under cornering/weight transfer, straightening the car our of a corner becomes a matter of weight transfer + and - counter-steering. In short, slow response.

My guess is that monoshock has also one major practical advantage: manufacturers save production cost!! :mrgreen:

User avatar
prp
Approved Member
Posts: 665
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:27 pm
Location: Lyon FRANCE
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by prp »

Jirka, they used the monoshock on the WC 89, because the track was very flat and with small bump.

And less weight , too !

User avatar
Mr. ED
Approved Member
Posts: 5478
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:30 am
Location: Back @ home: Belgium
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: YZ-834B Monoshock - setup / performance?

Post by Mr. ED »

prp wrote:Jirka, they used the monoshock on the WC 89, because the track was very and with small bump.

And less weight , too !
..and a lower CG, as well as lower air resistance; especially with some cars having the shock under the body.

Plenty of advantages, just a pitty it doesn't work so well :lol:

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • M.M.E Performance parts for what ?
    by Bullfrog » » in Other Makes/Models
    7 Replies
    818 Views
    Last post by Mr. ED
  • Battery Performance Database
    by makoman1860 » » in Vintage Electronics
    8 Replies
    970 Views
    Last post by tamiyadan
  • Kyosho- Peak Performance
    by Whiskers » » in Kyosho Forum
    6 Replies
    1613 Views
    Last post by Whiskers
  • Peak Performance Motor ID
    by jkelm24 » » in Vintage Electronics
    1 Replies
    1070 Views
    Last post by Charlie don't surf
  • Bandit performance potential
    by Saito » » in Traxxas Forum
    24 Replies
    5359 Views
    Last post by Chewbacca
  • Peak Performance...How high is it and how do we get there???
    by VINTAGE10 » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    9 Replies
    1349 Views
    Last post by longboardnj
  • The end of the performance brushed motors?
    by airbats801 » » in Vintage Electronics
    14 Replies
    3248 Views
    Last post by longboardnj
  • Info about Peak Performance Motor
    by ars10 » » in Vintage Electronics
    6 Replies
    977 Views
    Last post by MarkyDents

Return to “Yokomo Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests