A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

Post Reply
pedro
Approved Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:24 am
Location: Australia
Been thanked: 76 times

A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by pedro »

I always wondered why there was a wheel base option on rc10s but the nose plate only had the one set of holes taped for use. Then to my surprise I noticed that my early edition which I am rebuilding had them tapped ready to go. There really is quite a lot of differences on the earlier cars. Also noticed that the shocks have an alloy spacer in there instead of the thicker plastic one too back to the nose but I wonder when they stopped tapping them.... Anyone?

peter
Attachments
rc10 nose.jpg

User avatar
Ruffy
Approved Member
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by Ruffy »

Going to be hard to tell I think because I have very early no-stamp Edingers that are tapped, and also have Cadillacs as well as very late Stealth Transmission dated gold noseplates that are threaded as well. In fact, all of mine are threaded for both positions.

pedro
Approved Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:24 am
Location: Australia
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by pedro »

Well that is odd i have 3 gold rc10s and only the earliest one is threaded?

peter

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16521
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 954 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by scr8p »

Could it have something to do with roar rules or something like that? The long wheelbase setup would've been longer than allowed so they stopped tapping the holes to eliminate the option?

rctenracer
Approved Member
Posts: 1279
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:02 am
Location: michigan
Been thanked: 86 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by rctenracer »

Edinger to Caddy kits. Seems like if you purchased a RC10 during the change over you get what they in stock at the time.

pedro
Approved Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:24 am
Location: Australia
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by pedro »

Yeh maybe would have been a beast in long wheelbase mode especially with those kit fronts and slow servos back in the day maybe it was the 1/4 mile setup certainly wouldn't have liked hairpins, i remember seeing a pic of the early cars in england and i seemed quite popular to shorten the car by about 1cm and put spikes on the front for grass tracks.

peter
scr8p wrote:could it have something to do with roar rules or something like that? the long wheelbase setup would've been longer than allowed so they stopped tapping the holes to eliminate the option?

User avatar
Ruffy
Approved Member
Posts: 875
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by Ruffy »

I myself have 17 gold noseplates, stemming from the early no-stamp edinger RC10 ones, to late edinger, late cadillacs and even brand new in the bag ones that I got from AE as a Team Driver just after they released the B2, and all of mine are threaded for both positions. I forgot to include 3 of my RC10CE's that came with the stealth also are threaded in both positions.

pedro
Approved Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:24 am
Location: Australia
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by pedro »

maybe it's a southern hemisphere thing we always get shafted :lol:

peter

User avatar
Asso_man!
Approved Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:49 am
Location: EU
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by Asso_man! »

Note that the stock front tubes only had 1 position, which leads to think that the longer wheelbase has never been a real alternative. I honestly think that we have spotted all the differences between the early "Edinger" kits and the later models.
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Come and visit the stable

User avatar
RC10resto
Super Member
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:26 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 1081 times
Been thanked: 424 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by RC10resto »

What about the early chassis difference, has that been noted :?:

Charlie don't surf
Approved Member
Posts: 8921
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by Charlie don't surf »

RC10resto wrote:What about the early chassis difference, has that been noted :?:
Hmmm, I might have heard about that.......... :wink:

xanadu
Approved Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:45 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by xanadu »

I've had about 10 or 12 and none have ever had both sets threaded. In fact, that is how I always knew which hole to put it in. (the screws... Get your mind out of the gutter)

User avatar
CamplinP
Approved Member
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:43 pm
Location: Midwest Husker, USA
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by CamplinP »

I have 9 and 2 are threaded. No rime or reason either. One is on an all original short arm car and the other is on an original Team Car. Maby if they were behind on production they skipped this step.
The Fox, Falcon, 9 RC10s black/gold/graph, Optima Mid SE EXT, Losi XXXT, B3, B4, 3 T4s, Evader BX, Evader ST, Buggy Champ '09, Sand Scorcher '10, RC10T, RC10DS

Dumanyu
Regular Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:45 pm
Location: Arizona
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A few differences I noticed on my early rc10 (edinger)

Post by Dumanyu »

I know this is an old post, but I’m new on the forum. I’ll have to check that as I have an early no-stamp and just recently restored a CE. Hmmm.

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No User AvatarAmazon [Bot], No User AvatarBing [Bot] and 4 guests