Page 1 of 1

Front shocks

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:19 pm
by AYKBOBCAT
Just a quick question... are the buggy front shocks 1.02?

What do I need to complete those?

http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LX2580&P=7

I already have shafts, pistons and caps... If I just buy I rebuild kit like this one is it sufficient? I mean is it the proper rebuild kit?

http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LX2593&P=7

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:31 pm
by shodog
I think they are .71

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:39 pm
by AYKBOBCAT
Oh and what would the rear shocks be then?

What are the 1.02 made for?

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:41 pm
by badhoopty
1.02's are the 'short' rears. fronts are either .71's or .56's

i hate the way ae measures thier shocks...

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:25 pm
by scr8p
1.02's are standard front truck shocks. but can be used on the rear of the buggies to level out the arms without adding a bunch of spacers. if you have a tall front tower, you can use them on the front, also.

depending on which rc10 you have, original, or 6 gear ce and up, they could be either the .56's or the .71's.

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:17 pm
by badhoopty
where do they measure these darn things to get the lengths?

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:24 pm
by scr8p
badhoopty wrote:where do they measure these darn things to get the lengths?
i pretty sure it's the stroke of the shock shaft, inside to body.

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:58 pm
by JR
scr8p wrote:
badhoopty wrote:where do they measure these darn things to get the lengths?
i pretty sure it's the stroke of the shaft, inside to body.
Sounds like there was a chick @ associated that came up with that method. They are always into the size of shafts instead of what that shaft can do and how well it does it.

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:01 pm
by scr8p
JR wrote:
scr8p wrote:
badhoopty wrote:where do they measure these darn things to get the lengths?
i pretty sure it's the stroke of the shaft, inside to body.
Sounds like there was a chick @ associated that came up with that method. They are always into the size of shafts instead of what that shaft can do and how well it does it.
:lol: ya know, it didn't look like i typed it dirty until you pointed it out.