Page 1 of 1

Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:55 pm
by arf
I've seen these used to eliminate the risk of a ball cup popping off but It doesn't appear to be a common upgrade around here. Are they preferable?

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:16 pm
by Charlie don't surf
In a racing app, they allow more dirt to get into the socket, and wear out faster, and tend to cause breakage intead of being the weak link during high stress

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:26 pm
by arf
Charlie don't surf wrote:In a racing app, they allow more dirt to get into the socket, and wear out faster, and tend to cause breakage intead of being the weak link during high stress
Got it.

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:28 am
by Brandon G
When we ran the RC10GT AND the GT2, these were a necessity. The rear ball ends on the camber link were always popping off.. 1 tip, put a #4 washer between the screw head and the ball to prevent any chance of popping off.

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:56 am
by SteveK
Agree with everything above, and I've also found articulation to be more limited compared to ball cups. I have used them at times in the past on oval cars/trucks, but only for the convenience of being able to unscrew them rather than pop them on and off.

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:02 pm
by Jeep-Power
diggig up an oldie...

the ball cup ends cost me a race once (they pop off easily)

yeah- they wear ans bind easier, but I've run rod ends with washers ever since.

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:47 pm
by SteveK
But on the flip side, the crash that causes a ball cup to pop off could result in a broken part if you use a heim joint and a washer. Six of one, half-dozen of the other.

Re: Shock rod ends VS. ball cups

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:53 pm
by GJW
not more discissions to make :!: :lol: