Page 7 of 15

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:42 pm
by MelvinsArmy
That Ultima Pro would rule!

What's an edinger?

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:46 pm
by scr8p
tecnica2001 wrote:I was looking at a Kyosho Pro X manual, and the copyright was 1994.... :wink: would it qualify??
ya, the manual probably was printed in 94. in the jan 95 rcca, there's a "new for 95" section, and in there is the pro x. take that however you want.

i really don't care anymore.............

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:50 pm
by Soncho Ponza
Early Edinger RC10s----{u gots to be screwn with me though}---the talk on the diff types goes on and on Iv seen some great examples of early early versions from the brothers here....iv got a couple very early girls i havnt rebuilt....fun to build one into a racer and use it where nut cases like us might appreciate one.

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:52 pm
by MelvinsArmy
I'm looking through my July 94 issue of RCCA and I can't find a single Kyosho electric buggy in any Kyosho advertisement or Hobby shop ad. Nothing. Seems like there was a big nitro push going on at the time. I don't remember a Kyosho Pro X.

I think a good rule that should be considered for future vintage races is if you can find it in an ad from the cut off year, you can race it. Then we'd know it was available for sure.

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:57 pm
by Soncho Ponza
That would be a great way to cut down on--- can i run this, can i run this i can see the frustrations

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:57 pm
by MelvinsArmy
Soncho Ponza wrote:Early Edinger RC10s----the talk on the diff types goes on and on Iv seen some great examples of early early versions from the brothers here....iv got a couple very early girls i havnt rebuilt....fun to build one into a racer and use it where nut cases like us might appreciate one.
Soncho, I love your enthusiasm and I'm in a good mood fueled by a great painting session tonight and a few celebratory brewskies, so I'll save you my tirade. :lol:

I know what people mean by Edinger, I was just poking fun. I'm a bit of a non-believer in the label, that's all. 8)

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:05 pm
by Soncho Ponza
{OK YA RC10}--or what a person would call---Ya im a Dumb Beaner-- Cervesa-paint fumes--if from full scale lots of paint fumes on your end-----
I hear people tell me there is no such thing as a 64-1/2 mustang--it all makes for good talk-bs and fun :mrgreen:

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:07 pm
by tecnica2001
scr8p wrote:
tecnica2001 wrote:I was looking at a Kyosho Pro X manual, and the copyright was 1994.... :wink: would it qualify??
ya, the manual probably was printed in 94. in the jan 95 rcca, there's a "new for 95" section, and in there is the pro x. take that however you want.

i really don't care anymore.............
Did I push the wrong button here or something?? I'm not trying to get on anyone's bad side here, I apologize if any of my comments rubbed you the wrong way, I just thought that the Pro X was released before the XX.

Sorry... :?

Like I've said before, I started really looking at R/C car racing at around 1995, before that, I only played around with my Blackfoot, Striker and Super Hornet, I wasn't even aware of a whole racing world out there till 1995, so I'm still, till this day, learning...

:mrgreen:

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:24 pm
by scr8p
i'm sorry freddie. i guess i just kinda assumed that you would've found out if it would be legal before saying you were looking to find pro-x. my bad.

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:28 pm
by tecnica2001
No worries Bro... :mrgreen:

The Kyosho Triumph looks pretty sweet also, but if all else fails, I would go with the Ultima Pro.

I wouldn't mind going all Kyosho in 2010 at the VONATs. :wink:

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:37 pm
by tecnica2001
Is the Traxxas Hawk a competition level truck?? or would it fit in with Heavy Metal??

I've always liked the looks of the Hawk.... :wink:

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:48 pm
by MelvinsArmy
I think the Hawk is another borderline truck. I'd say it's competition is the JrT and early RC10 conversions. Maybe a slight step down, but definitely a more serious race machine than say a Blackfoot. Lot of grey areas with these cars.

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:23 pm
by civilguy
Same thought here. The Hawk is the same chassis as the Rad2- which I ran in 2wd buggy. I would say that any buggy chassis converted in a similar fashion would be stadium truck.
Just my thoughts-- Freddie, you can school 'em with a Hawk. :wink:

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:49 pm
by tecnica2001
There's lots of nice looking rigs out there, tempting me to buy them... :mrgreen:

What's on the Menu:
MRC MT-10M -- Grey Area :wink:
Kyosho Tracker -- Grey Area :wink:
Traxxas Hawk -- Grey Area :wink:

Hot Trick Blackfoot -- Gray Area too???

Sassy Chassied Blackfoot ???

Man, they had one of those are RCHR last year, they looked good also...

Just throwing some stuff out there for discussion and for the imagination... :mrgreen:

Re: 2010 -- VONATs -- Class Entry Discussion

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:56 pm
by MelvinsArmy
I'd say a Blackfoot in any form is Monster Truck class material. Just like how a Frog is not going to be in 2wd buggy class.

I think a Sledgehammer in MT would be cool to see. Or a Double Dare or that USA-1 that was for sale. It would be easy to do a Mud Blaster too now that you can get the re-release Brat body in lexan and hard plastic.