My 250,000 mile 1.6 liter Miata would disagree.Coelacanth wrote:Don't forget less durable. High-revving, low-cube motors have a shorter lifespan than the opposite. You can't have it all.markbt73 wrote:That would be my first choice. 4 cylinder turbo with a manual = lighter, better balanced, more efficient, cleaner. Funny how so many people complain about the "retro" styling, but not the antique engine configurations.longboardnj wrote:the look is different but i bet that is for better wind resistance. if that equals better mpg thats always good to hear.. any one else happy to see a 4 cl option? dont know all the specs but 310hp ,stick,and like 30mpg (not really sure mpg) sounds cool ...
At any rate, they still offer a V8, so it's choose-your-own-adventure.