fixed it for ya.mrlexan wrote: I was the only person that ran that body on my Hornet BITD.


fixed it for ya.mrlexan wrote: I was the only person that ran that body on my Hornet BITD.
Fixed what?scr8p wrote:fixed it for ya.mrlexan wrote: I was the only person that ran that body on my JRX-2 BITD.![]()
NAAAaaaa...that's just the hazing the new guys getmrlexan wrote:Bunch of haters round here these days.
aah. Yep...and they do a great job at it. I should just let the professionals give it to you thenmrlexan wrote:That's Reg's and Scr8p's job!
shirochanwrx wrote:I think that the bodies posted are pretty ugly, myself ... however, who is racing buggies or stadium trucks with attention to scale in mind, really?
I mean, the 2.2" wheels on buggies and stadium trucks are equivalent to 22 inch rims on a full size car, and with tires we are talking about pretty ridiculous scale implications. As noted previously in the thread, the scale "parachute bricks" of the short course vehicle boom are awful in terms of aerodynamics (not to mention windy-day jumping implications), but ...
... it seems that the scale appearance of short course racing may have saved the hobby. At least in combination with an explosion of spec-racing classes and zero-effort-investment Chinese built RTRs at until recently incredibly low initial price.
So perhaps a complete disregard to scale appearance in designing bodies is a dangerous thing. Or at least, lack of attention to scale may make an otherwise appealing class of racing, such as 2wd off road electric, less of a consideration for all but the boutique enthusiast.
I keep wondering if the way to "save" club-level 2wd buggy racing is to use spec short-course style wheels and tires front and rear (think Kyosho Ultima DB), spec Traxxas XL5/Titan or entry-level brushless combos, and require running baja-style beetle bodies on any 2wd buggy chassis. It would level the playing field, return a funky scale-like appearance to the class (which might attract new hobbyists), and make it possible for we retro enthusiasts to actually run our cars against new(er) blood more frequently.
Pro-line could even offer a spec wheel-tire-adapter-body combo that would cover just about any 2wd dating back to gold pan RC10s and little Losi's first rig.
I don't know about the older rim size working, there was a distinct advantage with a 2.2 rear tire in 1989 called the TR31Diggley wrote:shirochanwrx wrote:I think that the bodies posted are pretty ugly, myself ... however, who is racing buggies or stadium trucks with attention to scale in mind, really?
I mean, the 2.2" wheels on buggies and stadium trucks are equivalent to 22 inch rims on a full size car, and with tires we are talking about pretty ridiculous scale implications. As noted previously in the thread, the scale "parachute bricks" of the short course vehicle boom are awful in terms of aerodynamics (not to mention windy-day jumping implications), but ...
... it seems that the scale appearance of short course racing may have saved the hobby. At least in combination with an explosion of spec-racing classes and zero-effort-investment Chinese built RTRs at until recently incredibly low initial price.
So perhaps a complete disregard to scale appearance in designing bodies is a dangerous thing. Or at least, lack of attention to scale may make an otherwise appealing class of racing, such as 2wd off road electric, less of a consideration for all but the boutique enthusiast.
I keep wondering if the way to "save" club-level 2wd buggy racing is to use spec short-course style wheels and tires front and rear (think Kyosho Ultima DB), spec Traxxas XL5/Titan or entry-level brushless combos, and require running baja-style beetle bodies on any 2wd buggy chassis. It would level the playing field, return a funky scale-like appearance to the class (which might attract new hobbyists), and make it possible for we retro enthusiasts to actually run our cars against new(er) blood more frequently.
Pro-line could even offer a spec wheel-tire-adapter-body combo that would cover just about any 2wd dating back to gold pan RC10s and little Losi's first rig.
I'll second that idea.
Only the hard core racers appreciate UGLY.
The 1.5"-1.7" wheels worked for years until the ridiculous/bland looking 2.2 buggy wheels were introduced. Most buggies that did just fine without the larger wheels.
Not to get off topic, but been either in the woods or at work. Every free moment I have I am on the trail. I'd never leave you Reg, I know how your Man-crushes are. Relax, breath, and don't forget to take your medication (we don't want you to go back to the big house).Charlie don't surf wrote:You can't welcome someone back homeYou should never have left us...........where have you been all these um, days!! Your mother ( Halgar ) and step brother ( Hoopty ) were worried sick! You only ever think of yourself anymore
-
mrlexan wrote:Not to get off topic, but been either in the woods or at work. Every free moment I have I am on the trail. I'd never leave you Reg, I know how your Man-crushes are. Relax, breath, and don't forget to take your medication (we don't want you to go back to the big house).Charlie don't surf wrote:You can't welcome someone back homeYou should never have left us...........where have you been all these um, days!! Your mother ( Halgar ) and step brother ( Hoopty ) were worried sick! You only ever think of yourself anymore
-
Back around '88-'89, there were a few companies making 2.2 wheels for the RC10 and JRX2, in order to use Schumacher and Yoko tires. They were popular at our track, because they worked. As far as bodies, there were some ugly ones, as well as stylish. In those days, racers seemed to be more concerned with performance and modifications over looks.Charlie don't surf wrote: I don't know about the older rim size working, there was a distinct advantage with a 2.2 rear tire in 1989 called the TR31
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: Facebook [Bot],
Tbot [Bot] and 9 guests