Possibly to achieve a different Ackermann angle. Or to clear the steering ballcups from the upper tie rod ballcups.scr8p wrote:well, two of them were to set the steering bellcranks back. for what, i have no idea.

Possibly to achieve a different Ackermann angle. Or to clear the steering ballcups from the upper tie rod ballcups.scr8p wrote:well, two of them were to set the steering bellcranks back. for what, i have no idea.
at some point in time, it was probably because of ballcup clearance. if you had seen how this car was setup, this guy had no idea what ackermann was, or how to acheive a different angle for it. trust me.Minicooper 35 wrote:Possibly to achieve a different Ackermann angle. Or to clear the steering ballcups from the upper tie rod ballcups.scr8p wrote:well, two of them were to set the steering bellcranks back. for what, i have no idea.
HEY, i resemble that remark.templeofspeed wrote:Yeah, it all makes sense. *stupid dirt oval guys*...![]()
carloco8 wrote:Hey Temple, awesome score! Any idea on how you are going to build this one up, stock parts? aftermarket parts?
As in doing a 6037 with this chassis.I'm thinking of doing a World's Car graphite chassis conversion on this one if anyone can spare a proper AE 6232 front shock tower (I have a NIB 6377 rear for trade )
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests