RC10Talk - The Net's Largest Vintage R/C Community

Post pictures, please.

You think the arms are flexy? On the '94 YZ10? Those are solid arms, about as stiff as they get, unless you're used to running aluminum arms or something...

I did have Dynotech generate replicas of the '94 arms, but their machining constraints prevent them from replicating the kick-down in the arms. So their '94 repro arms are flat rather than bent like the originals. Maybe they're a bit stiffer, but again, the stock arms are plenty stiff.

stickboy007 wrote:Post pictures, please.

You think the arms are flexy? On the '94 YZ10? Those are solid arms, about as stiff as they get, unless you're used to running aluminum arms or something...

I did have Dynotech generate replicas of the '94 arms, but their machining constraints prevent them from replicating the kick-down in the arms. So their '94 repro arms are flat rather than bent like the originals. Maybe they're a bit stiffer, but again, the stock arms are plenty stiff.

i have a works 91 and they are very flexy ...

send me an pm with youre email and i will send pics.

mvh henrik

Even the Works arms aren't that flexy. Do you normally use concrete arms or something?

If the pictures are too large, you can shrink them down in MS Paint and post them here. No point sending them to one person when this forum is meant for sharing information like this.

stickboy007 wrote:Even the Works arms aren't that flexy. Do you normally use concrete arms or something?

If the pictures are too large, you can shrink them down in MS Paint and post them here. No point sending them to one person when this forum is meant for sharing information like this.

Compared to the arms on My kyosho lazer zxr the arms on My works -91 are very flexy.
I guess thats why those turnbuckles for front susp on the works -93

Yeah but i cant get to My photobucket account egen i can i Will post them here so for now those Who want to see
I can email .


Med vänlig hälsning, isobarik

stickboy007 wrote:Even the Works arms aren't that flexy. Do you normally use concrete arms or something?

If the pictures are too large, you can shrink them down in MS Paint and post them here. No point sending them to one person when this forum is meant for sharing information like this.

When You originate from the country of Volvo, You don´t want wobbly stuff on Your car

Haha...

I'll have to check my ZXR to see if the arms are more "solid" than the Works arms. Maybe they are, but I have a Works '93 runner and it's fantastic, "wobbly" arms and all.

The small turnbuckles for the front (and rear) arms in the Works '93 are actually to reduce bulkhead wear. By tightening it down, it presses the hinge pins against the bulkhead, thereby forcing the suspension arm only to rotate on the hingepin, rather than having the hingepin rotate inside the bulkhead and wear it out. Easier to replace worn plastic arms than work aluminum bulkheads.

aha i mean the ones in the front that goes to the uprights seams like they are there to stop the arm from flexing to much .....


mvh isobarik

Oh, the torque rods. Their primary purpose is to limit fore/aft play in the castor block.

stickboy007 wrote:Oh, the torque rods. Their primary purpose is to limit fore/aft play in the castor block.

aha ....they stpped the flexing also ...and lett when he won the worlds well....the arms was not originals,,.....

mvh isobarik

Do you have a picture? It would be nice to see what arms he used.

stickboy007 wrote:Do you have a picture? It would be nice to see what arms he used.

Nope i dont have but i would guess in the scans section

Mvh isobarik

stickboy007 wrote:Do you have a picture? It would be nice to see what arms he used.

stickboy007 wrote:Do you have a picture? It would be nice to see what arms he used.

here you go .....


mvh isobarik

Stickyboy ..................found 81mm bones .....

mvh isobarik