Page 3 of 5

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:58 pm
by THEYTOOKMYTHUMB
Diggley wrote:Besides, isn't the whole point of this site not to just show off, but to inspire others to join in on the fun? :D
Well said. :)

You also mentioned the Blackfoot in that post. Just when I think my collection is complete... :cry:

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2011 12:19 am
by CamplinP
My take is that if the person has a genuine interest in vintage R/C this is a good place for them. There are a few members on here that don't have an RC10, they do get razzed, but that is to be expected. Someday they will come around. They still have great suggestions and ideas when it comes to general tech, parts, how to, etc.

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:46 am
by Synergy
Regardless of opinion it's a point worthy of discussion from time to time imo and I think most points of view have merit 8)

This forum is without doubt the best one around for me and the stuff I have interest in and I guess it's testament to the current rules that in my absence of 18 months ish many new very worthy members have joined and not so many numpties (well they may have joined but don't appear to have hung around :wink: )

Anyway I just wanted to throw it out there and as it happens the topic seems to have been embraced as intended :D

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:33 am
by arf
When I'm too busy to race I read about racing on various forums. Compared to other RC sites, which are like entering a bar room brawl, this one is a gentleman's club.

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:02 pm
by CNA75
Lonestar wrote:Against... would make the forum narrow-minded, think a la worst of tamiyaclub... If you're an rc10 enthusiast, you should be a true vintage enthusiast, and if you truly like vintage rc, then the world goes way beyond rc10's ;)

Paul
I second that. This forum's strength is in its support of the wider vintage rc world. Maybe a requirement to have at least one vintage buggy generally, rather than an RC10?

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:08 pm
by MelvinsArmy
I've figured out the one requirement we need to have to join this site:













1. Don't be a jerk.
:D

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 2:18 pm
by Coelacanth
Synergy wrote:All new applicants should own (regardless of it's state) at least one pre B2 RC10 to qualify for forum registration.

Discuss.
Only if all other sections of this forum are removed. :roll:

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:09 pm
by mrlexan
reign79 wrote:Now would that rule mean building a rc10 :roll: I'm not saying names :P
Dont you start. :lol: Three pages and not one shot from Reg or Jason, WTH? Is it losing it's glamor? :mrgreen:

It would be impossible to police the suggestion, every would or could just lie (not saying I am for it or against it).

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:40 pm
by Charlie don't surf
mrlexan wrote:
reign79 wrote:Now would that rule mean building a rc10 :roll: I'm not saying names :P
Dont you start. :lol: Three pages and not one shot from Reg or Jason, WTH? Is it losing it's glamor? :mrgreen:

It would be impossible to police the suggestion, every would or could just lie (not saying I am for it or against it).
We have passed the responsibility to people that still care weather you build one or not, and I am gong through a Losi phase right now- so I'm on your side :lol:

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:45 pm
by shirochanwrx
mrlexan wrote:
Dont you start. :lol: Three pages and not one shot from Reg or Jason, WTH? Is it losing it's glamor? :mrgreen:

It would be impossible to police the suggestion, every would or could just lie (not saying I am for it or against it).
Syn, I don't want you to think that I was criticizing you for bringing up the notion of the criterion for membership on RC10talk.com; I think that discussing inclusion criteria in any self-selective peer group is warranted, and I think that this thread was a good example of that happening.

But when discussing policy, I think that it is ok to consider implementation ... and as Dr. Lex mentioned in his post, this would be nearly impossible to police, as a practical matter.

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:50 pm
by Incredible_Serious
arf wrote:When I'm too busy to race I read about racing on various forums. Compared to other RC sites, which are like entering a bar room brawl, this one is a gentleman's club.
Would that be because it's full of boobs???

:roll:

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:08 am
by Lowgear
Absolutely
Image

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:01 am
by Coelacanth

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:16 am
by RedScampi
Nothing wrong with a good pair of hooters!

Re: Discuss.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:35 am
by benny
I told a friend of mine about this place, said he should check it out...he currently races XXX-S on carpet, but he owns a T4. Izzat OK? :lol: Oh yeah, he has raced against Hisaki Mirosama...Misaki Hirosama...Salami Herosammich...whatever...