RC10Talk - The Net's Largest Vintage R/C Community

Maybe they were shootin' for some kinda WOIN type o'thing....

..a SC10B in old box art colors.

Phin wrote:..a SC10B in old box art colors.

My thoughts also

I think "meh" sums it up pretty well. Or a deep breath followed by a weak "yay".

Meh and Face Palm combo along with utter disappointment in AE! A big WTF shout out to the parties involved! You have the money and resources to do so much better than put a decal package on Jammin Jays (or whoever) SCORE buggy!

As much as I appreciate the history and sentiment, and the interest in celebrating the old ASSociated RC10, I have to admit that there is no way in H E double squiggly-bits that is a good representation of the original. As a supported race buggy, sure, a nice idea for a paint scheme to bring the two fields together. As a 'full sized RC10', it's as big a disappointment as my current paypacket

It's no 1:1 Sand Scorcher or Wild Willy, that's for sure.

Alex

No, no, you guys don't get it. See, what they want is for everyone to break out the hacksaws and dremels and start cutting their tubs down to look like this, that way when they do re-re the RC10, the parts won't be interchangeable.

It's ok, but I am on the fence whether or not I like it. ugh...

Incredible_Serious wrote:As much as I appreciate the history and sentiment, and the interest in celebrating the old ASSociated RC10, I have to admit that there is no way in H E double squiggly-bits that is a good representation of the original. As a supported race buggy, sure, a nice idea for a paint scheme to bring the two fields together. As a 'full sized RC10', it's as big a disappointment as my current paypacket

It's no 1:1 Sand Scorcher or Wild Willy, that's for sure.

Alex

Spot on Alex, definately no SS or WW.

you guys make me laugh. well, more like shake my head and roll my eyes, but there might have been a smile in there while i was doing it.

RichieRich wrote:I think "meh" sums it up pretty well. Or a deep breath followed by a weak "yay".

+1

I was looking forward to this, all they needed to do was modify a Funco buggy.

I demand to have a correct 1:1 RC10 for my new shelf. That and a full sized AT-AT will be my first purchases after wining the lotto.

RC10th wrote:I was looking forward to this, all they needed to do was modify a Funco buggy.

That's what I had in my head, too. Sigh, so much build-up for...

flipwils11 wrote:

RC10th wrote:I was looking forward to this, all they needed to do was modify a Funco buggy.

That's what I had in my head, too. Sigh, so much build-up for...

Agreed (100%)... Hey!, Team Associated:

[youtube]LCcZqcPOlNM&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/youtube]