RC10 ideal weight and balance???
RC10 ideal weight and balance???
Just wondering if any of you have any input on the ideal weight and balance for an RC10?
I am supposing that the graphite chassis cars will be lighter with a different front to rear balance.
What is the ideal balance for either an aluminum tub (my current build up) or a graphite car.
My graphite car specs are:
10 oz. weight in each front tire
18 oz. weight in each rear tire
Total weight is 3.49 lbs.
*mods include; klein arms, brushless motor and esc, lipo and TLR22 steering rack
I have seen some guys at the track put weights on the front of their cars (like on the new Kyosho and B4). I do not have alot of experience racing an RC10 so I would really appreciate any input on this topic. Thanks guys!
I am supposing that the graphite chassis cars will be lighter with a different front to rear balance.
What is the ideal balance for either an aluminum tub (my current build up) or a graphite car.
My graphite car specs are:
10 oz. weight in each front tire
18 oz. weight in each rear tire
Total weight is 3.49 lbs.
*mods include; klein arms, brushless motor and esc, lipo and TLR22 steering rack
I have seen some guys at the track put weights on the front of their cars (like on the new Kyosho and B4). I do not have alot of experience racing an RC10 so I would really appreciate any input on this topic. Thanks guys!
- Attachments
-
- rc10 mono shock whole car_small file.jpg (76.8 KiB) Viewed 2230 times
- rc10 mono shock whole car_small file.jpg (76.8 KiB) Viewed 2230 times
- Lonestar
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:17 am
- Location: Switzerland, yannow, in Europe (or almost)
- Has thanked: 623 times
- Been thanked: 170 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
It's such a peculiar car you have that no "optimal" (if there's such a thing) weight repartition data will ever apply to your ride (I personnally like that word). If I were you I'd be more concerned about tuning the front suspension first 
The front weight on the modern cars is mostly to reduce the rearward pitch effect on throttle (and hence allow them to turn on throttle).
Keep us posted what you find out!
Paul

The front weight on the modern cars is mostly to reduce the rearward pitch effect on throttle (and hence allow them to turn on throttle).
Keep us posted what you find out!
Paul
AE RC10 - Made In The Eighties, Loved By The Ladies.
Blue Was Better - now, Blue Is Bankrupt.
Facebook affiliate program manager: "They go out and find the morons for me".
Life is short. Waste it wisely.
Blue Was Better - now, Blue Is Bankrupt.
Facebook affiliate program manager: "They go out and find the morons for me".
Life is short. Waste it wisely.
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
You could go buy 4 small cheap postal scales and put em under the wheels and play with the balance of the car ala NASCAR
- Lonestar
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:17 am
- Location: Switzerland, yannow, in Europe (or almost)
- Has thanked: 623 times
- Been thanked: 170 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
from the figures he quotes he already does this328isjohn wrote:You could go buy 4 small cheap postal scales and put em under the wheels and play with the balance of the car ala NASCAR


Paul
AE RC10 - Made In The Eighties, Loved By The Ladies.
Blue Was Better - now, Blue Is Bankrupt.
Facebook affiliate program manager: "They go out and find the morons for me".
Life is short. Waste it wisely.
Blue Was Better - now, Blue Is Bankrupt.
Facebook affiliate program manager: "They go out and find the morons for me".
Life is short. Waste it wisely.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:20 pm
- Location: Houston
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
Judging by the weights posted this car has 64% of the weight on the rear (36/64). Most 2wd rear motor buggies have 67%-70%. I've measured many of them with 2 RC10's that I've weighed both coming in at 78% rear. I'm now sure why there is so much less on the rear of this car but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. It must be due to that battery. Rear motor cars can easily shift some weight forward and still handle very well because of where the weight is. There is no one right weight balance. Typically the looser the track the further rearward weight needs to be shifted. My thought is that you should move weight forward until you can no longer get good forward traction during acceleration. That's when you know you've gone too far.
Raborn Racing Originals Shapeways store
- Charlie don't surf
- Approved Member
- Posts: 9191
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
Good forward traction on an RC car has many other factors other than static weight distribution.fredswain wrote:Judging by the weights posted this car has 64% of the weight on the rear (36/64). Most 2wd rear motor buggies have 67%-70%. I've measured many of them with 2 RC10's that I've weighed both coming in at 78% rear. I'm now sure why there is so much less on the rear of this car but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. It must be due to that battery. Rear motor cars can easily shift some weight forward and still handle very well because of where the weight is. There is no one right weight balance. Typically the looser the track the further rearward weight needs to be shifted. My thought is that you should move weight forward until you can no longer get good forward traction during acceleration. That's when you know you've gone too far.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:20 pm
- Location: Houston
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
I'm aware of that. I've got a huge tuning tech thread over at rctech.
Raborn Racing Originals Shapeways store
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:04 am
- Location: San Jose, Ca.
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
Moving weight forward will increase your static traction on the front, but will increase the PERCENTAGE that one sees twards the rear under acceleration. I would have to look up my notes, but I am sure that mine are close to 33/67. I tune my cars for consistency, and accross the board they all come out similar. The way I see it, your car (with the SAME compound front and rear tire) SHOULD perform similarly through out the day. As the track changes, the car should get faster or slower depending on the track surface changes, but should not produce a over or under steer condition. I checked these weights against My FT b4.1 with various team setups, and they are very similar.
If the cars' weight distribution is off, as the surface changes, one will see either an oversteer or understeer condition based on the end of the car tha has the weight discrepency. If the track gets loose, and your car develops a push, then you need to add weigh to the front of the car (and vice versa). This can be a long process, as when you move weight to the front, you will now have a loose rear in higher bite conditions
. This will necessitate a suspension change. Just take your time and spend time tuning, or start with a proper weight distribution and only change the suspension. -Jeff
If the cars' weight distribution is off, as the surface changes, one will see either an oversteer or understeer condition based on the end of the car tha has the weight discrepency. If the track gets loose, and your car develops a push, then you need to add weigh to the front of the car (and vice versa). This can be a long process, as when you move weight to the front, you will now have a loose rear in higher bite conditions


-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:03 pm
- Location: birdsboro,pa
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
on my mid motored oval cars and trucks i usually get 56-57% on the rear.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:51 pm
- Location: Norfolk Nebraska
Re: RC10 ideal weight and balance???
My shortcourse converted 10T is happy around 59% rear. My T2 pan buggy likes 65%. Its all driver preference. Dont worry about "normal". Run what works best for you. You can use other peoples setup as a starting point but in the end its what like best.
Nick
Nick
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 18 Replies
- 3117 Views
-
Last post by MotoObscura
-
- 2 Replies
- 1318 Views
-
Last post by JK Racing
-
- 6 Replies
- 1681 Views
-
Last post by shane
-
- 6 Replies
- 1564 Views
-
Last post by RC10th
-
- 11 Replies
- 1629 Views
-
Last post by soniccj5
-
- 0 Replies
- 879 Views
-
Last post by dsmith
-
- 9 Replies
- 2558 Views
-
Last post by klavy69
-
- 2 Replies
- 1184 Views
-
Last post by KidAgain
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests