Project Graphite

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

User avatar
jwscab
Approved Member
Posts: 6569
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Project Graphite

Post by jwscab »

there are only one set of holes in the chassis, as you show. the wheelbase can be changed by moving the rear arm mounts front and back, there should be 4 holes in them?

that's all you can do with the rear bumper with a litespeed heatsink, unless you can figure out a small bracket that can tie the two together.

User avatar
JK Racing
Approved Member
Posts: 4618
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Placentia, CA
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 242 times

Re: Project Graphite

Post by JK Racing »

The rear arm mounts themselves have the option of being mounted "forward" or "rearward", adjusting the wheelbase. If (from the bulkhead looking back) you are in the front "set" of holes, you are mounted "rearward", you have a longer wheelbase, your dogbones will be swept back as they approach the wheels. If you are in the rear "set" of holes, you are mounted "forward", the dogbones appear to be more straight across and the wheelbase of the car is shorter.

The rear motor guard bolted to the chassis and then the stock motor plate (like a standard chassis would, behind the motor), but with the litesink, you dont have that option.

Back to wheelbase, I'm sure there are better descriptions on what it does to the car, but here are the basics I have always followed:

Longer wheelbase, better on rough tracks, but you lose some steering.
Shorter wheelbase, better steering, but you lose rough track stability.

For the shelf...not sure, havent raced on one of them yet! :mrgreen:
--Joey --
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com

User avatar
RCveteran
Approved Member
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:48 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: Project Graphite

Post by RCveteran »

Intersting, you know, in rebuilding I noticed the extra holes and did not give it any thought. Yes longer in general better for larger and rough trucks. Not sure I will ever run this one so we shall see.

User avatar
RCveteran
Approved Member
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:48 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: Project Graphite

Post by RCveteran »

Scored a buddy off the BAY to finish it up. I used a Bud's bi-level wing because I had one and the Trinity motor is straight out of the package. This one will just sit. With the exception of the chassis, rear arm mounts and bulkhead which were dyed the rest was all new black parts.
DSCF4461.JPG
DSCF4462.JPG
DSCF4463.JPG
DSCF4464.JPG
DSCF4465.JPG

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No User AvatarAmazon [Bot] and 3 guests